To: PJ-Comix
Ah yes. But the beauty of their argument is that Bush is responsible because 1). he went after terrorists thereby making them angry and 2). because he didn't go after terrorists and eliminate the threat.
The DUmmies aren't known for their logic.
3 posted on
03/13/2004 5:34:18 PM PST by
tbeatty
To: tbeatty
I love symmetry....
5 posted on
03/13/2004 5:35:16 PM PST by
clintonh8r
(Vietnam veteran against John Kerry, proud to be a "crook" and a "liar.")
To: tbeatty
The weird thing here is that the Lefties maintain that there was NO relation between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda. So Spain supports us on Iraq and Al Qaeda attacks them for such support. So if no relation between Al Qaeda and Iraq, why would Al Qaeda attack the Spanish? The Lefty theory of no relation between Al Qaeda and Iraq appears to have no basis in reality.
9 posted on
03/13/2004 5:37:28 PM PST by
PJ-Comix
(Saddam Hussein was only 537 Florida votes away from still being in power)
To: tbeatty
The link I was directed to and read sounded more like alot of views over at DU think BUSH and the CIA are the terrorists and it was all a set up.
There was a couple of post that said hogwash to that ideology and it made me wonder if those posters where FReepers posting over at DU or that possibly some DU posters are rational.
30 posted on
03/13/2004 5:52:48 PM PST by
oceanperch
(`It's A Boy Address:http://community-2.webtv.net/YaquinaBay/LangleyPortar)
To: tbeatty
As of right now, I'm fighting with the lib losers at the Metallica forums. Some have just said the same thing over there; blaming Bush for the bombings in Spain. Ridiculous!
I'm horribly outnumbered over there -the way I like it!
45 posted on
03/13/2004 6:23:00 PM PST by
RandallFlagg
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">miserable failure)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson