Former White House terrorism czar Richard Clarke said Sunday that President Clinton would have been more likely to prevent the Sept. 11 attacks than President Bush, because he took the threat posed by al Qaeda more seriously.
Ah but Dick, he did nothing to prevent 9/11.
19 posted on 03/22/2004 2:09:37 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
...because he took the threat posed by al Qaeda more seriously.
Clinton took nothing seriously; he left running things to the Arkansas mafia he brought with him and a cadre of academic elites w/ no real world experience.
71 posted on 03/22/2004 5:30:57 AM PST by banjo joe