Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Say it ain't so!
1 posted on 03/25/2004 2:09:34 PM PST by journey7873
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: journey7873
Good luck with that, there.
2 posted on 03/25/2004 2:10:54 PM PST by Xenalyte (in memory of James Edward Peck, my grandfather, who passed on 3/23/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
This thread is as doomed as doomed can be
3 posted on 03/25/2004 2:11:48 PM PST by murdoog (I changed my tagline back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
"We have defeated the Taliban, and we are in the process of smashing al-Qaeda."
Richard Clarke Dec. 4 2001
4 posted on 03/25/2004 2:11:54 PM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

um..
8 posted on 03/25/2004 2:13:28 PM PST by ambrose ("I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it" - John F. al-Query)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
Guilty as charged. It was a sarcastic reply to an absurd Wall Street Journal op ed piece that was promoting the idea that it doesn't matter if US presidents are illegal drug users. Naturally, I objected.
10 posted on 03/25/2004 2:13:48 PM PST by Jim Robinson (warning: some parts of this post may be plagiarized - some parts may be sarcasm - no parts edible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
This is old news so why are you bringing it up now?
13 posted on 03/25/2004 2:14:30 PM PST by Sally'sConcerns (It's painless to be a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
Are you saying you believe George Bush is a cokehead?
18 posted on 03/25/2004 2:16:33 PM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sidebar Moderator
Can we move this out of News?
22 posted on 03/25/2004 2:19:04 PM PST by kevkrom (The John Kerry Songbook: www.imakrom.com/kerrysongs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
Good idea. End Prohibition Now.

So9

25 posted on 03/25/2004 2:19:56 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
Found this on Google:

Free Republic Sucks
... Well, by God, if you people insist on electing another cokehead as President, you
damned well better throw open all the prison cell doors and free every man ...
www.freerepublicsucks.s5.com/crackdownmay2003.htm - 18k - Cached - Similar pages

Here is what the page looks like... Didn't know the site existed. If they have a small server, this will swamp them out!!!!


 May 2003


Zealot web-owner bans members

CRACKDOWN!

By Edgar Hall, Political Editor
WHEN crusading Conservative Jim Robinson first set up Free Republic six years ago, he had high hopes for his message board baby. It wouldn't be like all the other political forums he posted on, which regularly denied him free speech. Oh no, Siree!

His forum, to borrow from the mission statement on the homepage, would "roll back decades of governmental largesse, root out political fraud and corruption and champion causes which further conservatism in America". If posters wanted to sound off against the government, that was just fine with Jim. And if one of those posters happened to believe George W Bush was a "cokehead felon ", good luck to him!

That was six years ago.

In 2003, things are rather different at the Fresno-based Free Republic and the poster who trashed Dubya would now be banned instantly. Ironically, that poster was... Jim Robinson himself. In 1999, he incensed his readers by making the following post:

To: Freedom Wins

So, it doesn't matter if he [Bush] snorted coke as a youth? It was a long time ago, a youthful in-discretion? Kinda like people who frequented sneakeasies during prohibition? Kind of a cute story, eh? Well, how about all the people whose lives have been destroyed by being arrested for the felony of drug possession? What about the millions of people who are rotting away in your filthy drug infested prisons at this very moment?

Well, by God, if you people insist on electing another cokehead as President, you damned well better throw open all the prison cell doors and free every man, woman, and child you're holding on drug charges. And if you're gonna elect another drug felon as President, you'd better rescind each and every one of your unconstitutional drug laws now on the books, including all of your unconstitutional search and seizure laws, and your asset forfeiture laws, and your laws that enable your unconstitutional snooping into our bank accounts and cash transactions. Well, I don't know whether to laugh or cry. You people are sick! Conservatives my ass. You people are nothing but a bunch of non-thinking hypocrits! You're a shame and a disgrace to the Republic!

And, I, for one, am tired of taking orders from cokeheads and felons! Elect another one and I'll tell you what. I'll be ready for war! It'll be time to take up arms and run the filthy lying bastards out!

Posted on 08/20/1999 03:19:31 PDT by Jim Robinson

Nowadays such attacks on Dubya are mightily unwelcome - don't you know there's a war on? - and a new breed of "Texas Chainsaw" moderators has instructions to stamp down on any insubordination.

Appalled at the change in direction, many of Jim's closest followers have predictably deserted FR in protest - followers like Joe Phillips, Robinson's friend and chief fundraiser, who blames head moderator "Ms Anti Feminazi" for the change in outlook. After longtime poster "Askel5" was zapped last month for questioning Rumsfeld's integrity, Phillips blasted: "I tried and tried to get JR to understand that banning folks like "Askel5" was dumbing down the forum.

"But to my knowledge the only one he listens to is dumbass "MAF", the leader of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre gang. I have been consistantly amazed that the five or six good moderators have stayed on with this mental midget dips**t."

In fact, the banning of "Askel5" had little or nothing to do with "MAF". It was wholly Robinson's decision and the reason he gave may have suggested he could give any self-respecting "mental midget" a run for his money. When "Askel5" tried to reply to some fairly hostile flamebaiting, she received the blunt message, "Your posting privilege has been revoked. Reason: Saddam apologist."

So are the moderators really out of control or is it perhaps Jim who needs to take a break? "Jim calls the shots," insists one of the mods, who agreed to talk to us under condition of anonymity. "Sure, we get a little power-crazed from time to time and suspend a few folks. But if we over-step the mark, these people are back posting within days. Jim oversees everything. He isn't some bewildered old man who doesn't know what's going on - he reads the forum religiously.

"I don't know about the others but I get a little fed up with the abuse we get. It's an unpaid job on one of the busiest political forums there is. You see all these breakaway forums setting up and they all swear they won't go the same way as Free Republic. Yet within months they are banning posters willy-nilly."

But a former moderator sees things rather differently, claiming her successors actually get a kick out of banning people's accounts. Poster "Mercuria", who was once a moderator and member of the elite Free Republic Advisory Board, insists: "The mods and Jim (whom I'm sure is ALSO a mod) certainly chortle enough with their ZAPS and ZOTS.

"They've made no secret that they enjoy being able to shut down the debate of anyone who disagrees with them, no matter how reasonable the dissenters are being. They think all this is cute. Gives them that big Ego Rush of Belonging they obviously can't get off-line."

One such dissenter was Christopher Knight, who also found himself out in the cold recently for not loving the "cokehead felon". This time the reason Jim gave wasn't "Saddam apologist" but instead "Liberal". Which he isn't, unlike Robinson who used to be a registered Democrat.

"I joined FR as "Darth Sidious" in January of 1999 because its overwhelming mission was restoring the rule of law to this land during Clinton's fiasco of an administration," explains Knight. "What happened to Free Republic was the sad old story of obsession: the site and its management became so obsessed with destroying an enemy, it became the enemy.

"There is no more free and earnest discussion on this site. Anger the Robinsons [Jim's son John is also involved in FR] or their gang of "moderators" and you get banned. Do something they particularly don't like and all your posts - years worth of them even - get obliterated down the "memory hole". You cease to exist on FR anymore... because there is no individuality where "the party" is concerned."

Robinson has since reactivated Knight's account but he has not posted there since his banning. And if Free Republic continues to resemble the online version of Orwell's 1984, he probably won't be back for a while.

As "Mercuria" says: "I'd always thought that being a conservative was about respecting independent thought and open debate - am I wrong?"

Apparently, she is wrong. "Independent thought and open debate" are no longer permissable at Free Republic - except maybe for that one little guy who thinks President Bush is a "cokehead felon".


Good Hunting... from Varmint Al

37 posted on 03/25/2004 2:27:24 PM PST by Varmint Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
Didn't the tone of the post give you the slightest hint that it was over-the-top and an attempt at humor?
53 posted on 03/25/2004 2:39:18 PM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
HERE is THE REAL COKEHEAD.................................

OUR REAL COKEHEAD PREZ

64 posted on 03/25/2004 2:51:52 PM PST by soozla (Putting "butter on the message bread" since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
I would rather dispute this story, for any of a number of reasons, but mostly because George W. Bush is a Republican, not a Democrat. Basic difference in world view. Practically everybody who has surrendered to a full-blown addiction, to the point where intervention and detox were needed, has, in the end, turned to the gospels as preached by the Democrats. For these people, there is no sense of having sinned, only that they are now clean and sober, at least on the short term.

I grant you, there are individuals who have gone through the same valley of shadows and darkness, and emerged on the other side, and today are practicing and believing Republicans. But they are rare, and do not normally rise to high levels in society. And they repent of their sins, recognizing them as such.

74 posted on 03/25/2004 3:09:09 PM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873; Jim Robinson
1st, 2nd & 3rd Rule of Hermeneutics:
CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT!

76 posted on 03/25/2004 3:11:01 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
"Well, by God, if you people insist on electing another cokehead as President, you damned well better throw open all the prison cell doors and free every man, woman, and child you're holding on drug charges."

If rumors of breaking a questionable law decades ago should prohibit one from becoming president like you say, then there’d be no one left to run. I didn’t care if Clinton did drugs and I don’t care if Bush did them. I just care if they have the character to have grown out of such self destructive behavior.

80 posted on 03/25/2004 3:15:18 PM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
Say it ain't so!

It was, but is now a moot issue.

We picked him apart as was our duty to do so during the primaries.

In the end, we elected the right man, as so many have found.

Personally, I never believed the rumors of major coke use. They were started by a old college buddy who left that question a blank when asked if he knew of any other instances of coke use by GWB. The press filled in the blanks with mucho accusations but none panned out.

The issue was forgotten and this post comes up from time to time.

So let's just leave it at that.

87 posted on 03/25/2004 3:40:07 PM PST by Cold Heat (Suppose you were an idiot. Suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. --Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
whatcha smokin'? and do you have enough twinkies?
88 posted on 03/25/2004 4:28:14 PM PST by cyborg (my profile page speaks for itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
He did, and he changed his mind. Have your views on things changed over the years?
96 posted on 03/25/2004 8:09:37 PM PST by ladyinred (Weakness Invites War. Peace through Strength.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
Index.
97 posted on 03/25/2004 8:10:19 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: journey7873
This thread just isn't complete without AABERT's graphic of Bush snorting coke.
102 posted on 03/26/2004 1:29:43 AM PST by bayourod (We can depend on Scary Kerry's imaginary foreign leaders to protect us from terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson