Neat.
1 posted on
03/29/2004 5:04:20 PM PST by
vannrox
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: vannrox
The link in post 53 (& perhaps somewhat 54) at:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1107379/posts makes it sound like all such are very outdated.
Which reminds me of a Navy friend I met at a human relations project--worked in some super secret stuff at 29 Palms or some such place . . .
said we had MORE THAN 10 technologies, weapons systems EACH ONE WORSE than the atomic weapons.
Wonder if he was talking about scalar stuff.
44 posted on
03/29/2004 7:38:50 PM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: vannrox
It seems to me that it would be much easier to hire spies to simply go into the nuke room of their respective countries and turn all of the batteries around in the bombs - thus rendering them useless.
45 posted on
03/29/2004 8:33:42 PM PST by
Jaysun
(JOHN KERRY can be rearranged to spell HORNY JERK. Coincidence?)
To: vannrox
This is a complete load of crap. If you have a particle accelerator of this size, use something else besides neutrinos.
This author has no clue what.
52 posted on
03/30/2004 5:00:27 AM PST by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson