Replies

I see a link to an article but no date and your the one who posted it. Also freepers have links at post 76, 200, 252, and 309. No dates are given of those articles at those noted post. You should be consistent in your trivial criticism of peoples habits here when posting.

My reply #416 chronicled the economic polices of Juan Peron, while your reply #399 was a comment on recent electoral trends that were refuted by the mid term election of 2002.

Juan Peron was a historical figure and his personna still resonates in Argentina today, IMO, to that country's detriment.

My reply #416 chronicled the economic polices of Juan Peron, while your reply #399 was a comment on recent electoral trends that were refuted by the mid term election of 2002.

Spin it all you want, you didn't post a date of your article either. If you have a problem with what I did or did not post, go complain to the moderator and have him/her straighten this point of contention out or show us where in the Free Republic rules it says we have to post a date. All one has to do is follow the link to the article.

As far as being refuted I disagree. One could say that 9-11 defined that election so it was quite the anomaly. If 9-11 did not happen, the trend in the article in all probability would have continued. Thanks for making my argument pertaining to the date of the article.