[TLI]

You picked `em bubba. And as usual when confronted with a whiff of reality, accusers go screaming off into lala land spouting racism. Using such shortcuts and making unfounded accusations is typical of unsupportable arguments. Actually, it is typical fodder found over on DU. Are you lost?

As for "political agenda" and "racial purity". . . huh? I pointed out an inconsistency in a statement. Racial purity seems to be heavy on your mind as is your hast to declare someone a raciest.

Must have been when I actually stated the source to back up the origin of the pic....

[Luis Gonzalez]

You used an inconsistency to illustrate a fallacy.

Amerindians are no more representative of Hispanics, than Navajos are representative of Americans.

[William Wallace]

As for "political agenda" and "racial purity". . . huh? I pointed out an inconsistency in a statement.

You did nothing of the kind. You posted photos of an Indian family and a little blonde, blue-eyed Scandanavian girl (part of your Vast jpeg collection I presume). You continue to insist, even after your mistake has been pointed out repeatedly, that the Indians in the first pic are somehow representative of Hispanics. Which is comparable to using photos of Geronimo and Sitting Bull to "prove" our Founding Fathers weren't white.