To: LdSentinal
Heavy US casualties possible in Ar Ramadi.
62 posted on
04/06/2004 12:08:27 PM PDT by
Dog
To: Dog
Heavy US casualties possible in Ar Ramadi. Your updates are appreciated to us folks here in Cubeland...
73 posted on
04/06/2004 12:10:23 PM PDT by
Fury
To: Dog
Heavy US casualties possible in Ar Ramadi. God I hope not!
75 posted on
04/06/2004 12:10:51 PM PDT by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
To: Dog
I heard the same thing per Fox Bret Baer
To: Dog
Heavy US casualties possible in Ar Ramadi.
Where are you getting your info?
To: Dog
Heavy US casualties possible in Ar Ramadi I sure hope not. I hope those brave men kick a$$.
hawk
115 posted on
04/06/2004 12:19:09 PM PDT by
hawkaw
To: Dog
we seem to not be using armor or air power in this, and we are taking alot of ground casualties. i don't like it, it smells like one of these PC "don't hurt the children" things. its one thing to not target civilians, no one is for that, but this just seems to be on the opposite extreme. it sounds worse then the initial advances to take the country were.
To: Dog
"Heavy US casualties possible in Ar Ramadi."
Source???
153 posted on
04/06/2004 12:25:41 PM PDT by
Getsmart64
(LANTIRN - Designed to kill, maim, and destroy ....America's enemies...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson