To: TrebleRebel
"[T]here is little if any proof that the bin Laden network ever acquired weapons of mass destruction other than poisons like cyanide and ricin."
Just cyanide and ricin? Well that's ok then.
5 posted on
04/08/2004 5:29:58 AM PDT by
jocon307
(The dems don't get it, the American people do.)
To: jocon307
Phew! I agree ... those hardly even count.
6 posted on
04/08/2004 5:42:36 AM PDT by
The G Man
(John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world. Vote Bush-Cheney '04.)
To: jocon307
Yes I am a toxicologist and RICIN as indented to be used by these guys is a WMD in my mind.
BTW--the RICIN found in London was traced back vis Al Qaida terrosists aided by Saddam to the camp in Northern Iraq. So it all makes perfect sense.
But that's OK nothing to see here. Iraq had no WMD. Increadibly potent toxins meant to kill thousands at a time don't count. and of course Iraq and Al Qaida were never connected in anyway.
The liberal press is so used to mass slanting that even they get lazy and let the thruth slip under masked headlines.
BTW--ricin-induced death is not any prettier than anthrax-associated mortality. and there is no known antidote.
10 posted on
04/08/2004 6:40:02 AM PDT by
rod1
(On the front line)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson