To: oceanagirl
This is very stupid idea. Nuclear technology to China?
2 posted on
04/09/2004 3:45:20 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: Alter Kaker
Well, I'm not very comfortable with this, if true. Surely, there must be some explantion.
To: Alter Kaker
"This pitch could not be more poorly times," Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, told a hearing of the House International Relations Committee recently. No time is good for these people.
Actually, this would be a good idea. It will help preserve the skills needed for nuclear plant construction in this country.
5 posted on
04/09/2004 3:49:11 PM PDT by
glorgau
To: Alter Kaker
Nuclear technology to China? It's probably too little, too late, but the peak easy oil problem cound be reduced somewhat this way.
7 posted on
04/09/2004 3:51:59 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
To: Alter Kaker
To: Alter Kaker
Do you think that the US is the only country bidding on this job?
To: Alter Kaker
No, it's a good idea. We get revenue and hone our industry skills until we come to our senses and start building the things here again.
The Chinese know how to make bombs. This isn't going to make them more dangerous.
48 posted on
04/10/2004 1:09:00 PM PDT by
Tribune7
(Arlen Specter supports the International Crime Court having jurisdiction over US soldiers)
To: Alter Kaker
This is very stupid idea. Nuclear technology to China?Yeah. Who but Billy-Goat-Jeffy Clinton would have conceived of such a hair-brained and dangerous idea?
Christians believe in a hereafter in heaven while socialist-commies believe they'll get a better deal in hell.
50 posted on
04/10/2004 1:12:32 PM PDT by
JesseHousman
(Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson