While it's probably spitting into the wind to suggest that a lowering of the harsh rhetoric may allow more calm and dispassionate policy makers and commentators to move us closer to a national policy acceptable to all, like chicken soup, it may not be a cure, but it's worth a try. (I hate long sentences)-- But, as anyone reading this is well aware, the likelihood of that rapproachment' is some where between zero and none.
Our successful polarization of the American public has caused us diminishment as the perceived leader of the Free World and a power that applies its power wisely and with restraint. Whether this is accurate or not, in this case, the perception is reality. We appear to move from ad hoc decision to the next ad hoc decision made in response to a crisis, not in pursuit of an intelligent plan having a coherent end at the conclusion of the means. Here again, it's the perception that counts.
To our own people as well as to those in the world whose opinion and following we hope to gain, we appear to be thrashing about in search of a clearly articulated end purpose without having an understanding of the means to achieve that end. And, our traditional allies see us as speaking of collective security and hoping for their cooperation while, at the same time, ignoring their counsel and their offers to cooperate if given a measure of authority to control the means applied commensurate with their responsibility to accomplish the mission. Thus, again, whether accurate or not, the appearance of omniscience and omnipotence we project seems to them as an ultimatum that - - either they are with us and operate under our direction or, they are against us.
Probably all can see the problem but the deeply rooted obduracy at the opposite ends of the spectrum prevent the implementation of policies that may lead us and them to an international resolution. Nothing so beneficial and salutary is anywhere to be seen on the horizon.
I've been polarized for a long time. Since about 1990 in fact. The other side could have lowered the rhetoric (esp. following 2000 election). They haven't done one damn thing to do so. Remember His Slickness blaming OKC on talk radio and us right=wingers?
Lowering the rhetoric is for diplomats and corporate creatures. Myself, i prefer the verbal rapier delivered with a twist and the wink of an eye. 'Pod.
But post your message of moderation on Democrat Underground and see what you get.
It takes two to make a peace. But only one can make a war...