Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RonHolzwarth
"Very much as the parables of Jesus were meant to be instructive, to inform, to make a point, obviously not to be taken as having literally happened."

Yep, the parables were. But New Testament scripture talks of Noah and the flood as an historical event.

All boils down to what we each choose to believe.

34 posted on 04/27/2004 12:59:31 PM PDT by MEGoody (Kerry - isn't that a girl's name? (Conan O'Brian))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: MEGoody
Ancient text and the bible said that the ark was in Armenia. The problem is that Ancient Armenia was in the mountains of Iran. Which is why the Bible said that the left the ark and traveled from the east into the Mesopotamia plain.

The current mount Ararat didn't even get its current name till the 12th century. That is when the Armenian Christians had the Bible translated into their own language. And since that is the only mountain of note in the area, it became "Ararat." If you read the scripture it says the "mountainS" of Ararat. It is in the mountains, not on a lone mountain on a plain.

38 posted on 04/27/2004 1:17:36 PM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson