Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marines Prepare for Fallujah Pull Back (Fox Reports NO PEACE DEAL in Fallujah)
AP ^ | Thu, Apr 29, 2004 | Jayson Keyser

Posted on 04/29/2004 4:15:58 AM PDT by Eurotwit

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-337 next last
To: Husker24
"Thank God, I was beginning to feel like a Frenchman."


When I first hear Fox and their "ALERT", their sources a LATimes "in-bed" and the AP, my thoughts were similar, sounded a bit JFKerrish.
101 posted on 04/29/2004 6:07:06 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: SBprone
Another fantastic report from Wretchard.

Thanks.
102 posted on 04/29/2004 6:07:21 AM PDT by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
Further reporting from Fox.

Emphasis on the fact that this is not a pull-out, according to their Pentagon sources. (I tend to trust Fox's sources.) Further, there are several tracks of negotiations on-going, one of which might use Iraqi troops under coalition command.

I feel I must also emphasize here that the negotiations are NOT between the Marines and the insurgents. The negotiations are between the city officials and elements of the coalition, the Iraqi governing council, and sheiks influential in the area. The idea (again now quoting Fox) is to have a peaceful resolution and neutralize the insurgents; also the Pentagon says that what we have been seeing on the TV in Fallujah is NOT a full-scale offensive, but rather targeted hits in reponse to attacks from the bad guys, which have happened despite the cease-fire.

Having re-read this story, I see that AP is basing most of it on what Tony Perry told CNN. I think that's a little too much filtering, myself.

103 posted on 04/29/2004 6:08:14 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
You can slice it any way you want but this is not a story of victory for the occupation. The Marines did their duty, you can be sure of that. There was a political decision made to move them out. They did not get their perimeter overrun.

Were the amount of civilian casualties too excessive in the court of world opinion? This will only embolden more resistance. The decision maker that made this decision will have to make the decision that we leave Iraq with our tail between our legs. That is the only reasonable conclusion. This military operation has been characterized by poor decisions and intelligence.

104 posted on 04/29/2004 6:11:37 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: rrrod
Carpet bombing from B52s is not an exact science. The Marines have to withdraw to a safe distance.
105 posted on 04/29/2004 6:15:18 AM PDT by Agent Smith (Fallujah delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Down in Njaf the terrorists are apparently being picked off one be one. Maybe that could be a template for Fa-lou-ja.
106 posted on 04/29/2004 6:18:15 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Agent Smith
I understand this to be a cease fire, a mutual agreement to stop the fighting, and to turn over patrols to the Iraqi Army. June 1 is quickly coming. Like it or not, Bush has pledged to turn things over to the Iraqis by that date. From a political standpoint, plowing into Fallujah at this late date would disrupt the June 1 deadline. It's inevitable.
107 posted on 04/29/2004 6:20:10 AM PDT by mikhailovich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: All
It is possible the AC130 hits the other night destroyed the enemy leadership and their ammo supply and given that they don't particularly exist anymore, the Iraqi force can keep the peace there.

The size of those explosions justify a possibility that those who killed the American contractors are dead.
108 posted on 04/29/2004 6:20:21 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Owen
You're putting lipstick on a pig.
109 posted on 04/29/2004 6:23:19 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bogdanPolska12
Bogdan, what do you hear about this one?

Becki

110 posted on 04/29/2004 6:24:48 AM PDT by Becki (Pray continually for our leaders and our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
Does this surprise anyone? A peace deal with be on our terms. We appear to be attempting an abject lesson to terrorists.
111 posted on 04/29/2004 6:25:15 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I feel I must also emphasize here that the negotiations are NOT between the Marines and the insurgents. The negotiations are between the city officials and elements of the coalition, the Iraqi governing council, and sheiks influential in the area.

(My Bold).

112 posted on 04/29/2004 6:26:50 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
We will see how this plays out. It'll be interesting to watch the Coalition press briefing today.

But as far as Tony Perry goes (and Brennan Byrne), I don't really see how they contradict the reporting from Fox all that much, except for the headline and the way the article is spinned. The items reported as facts seem to correspond fairly well with the new reports from Fox. IMHO it is AP more than Perry who is responsible for the spinning.

I guess I am so used to having to decode the truth from the heavily biased Norwegian media, that I don't even notice the spin anymore. I quickly try to wade through the opiniated crap to discern the few tidbits of "news" that is contained in the overall article.

I fully trust the President and the people on the ground making these decisions.

There is really no one ideal solution, but if I am to venture my own uneducated (and uninformed) opinion, I would say that an Iraqi solition to the Fallujah situation does seem to be preferable.

BTW. I did not post this story under breaking news. Someone else put it there.

Cheers.
113 posted on 04/29/2004 6:27:10 AM PDT by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
"It seems to me our left wing press has moved the objective of 'Capturing those who killed and mutilated the bodies of Americans!' to 'How do we prevent the destruction of Fallujah?'. "

I've noticed too. The same press that has been intimating that armchair generals might try to run the war from home and turn Iraq into the Next Viet Nam appear to demanding that armchair generals at home prevent the destruction of Falluja at all cost, turning Iraq into the Next Vietnam.

114 posted on 04/29/2004 6:28:18 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I'm also beginning to think that putting an Iraqi face on the confrontation in Fallujah has its advantages. As long as we maintain the cordon sanitaire around Fallujah, letting Iraqis do the dirty work has two advantages: 1) it's not our boys killing Iraqis, and 2) their brutality (since they won't be able to do things with our precision and won't care that they can't) will make us look good.

Further, as long as the insurgents are isolated, better they're bottled up there than making trouble elsewhere. Eventually, they'll come out to play, and they'll get off'ed.

115 posted on 04/29/2004 6:28:18 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: prophetic
Evacuate the woman and children and nuke the site. We have Kerry, the UN, Hillary, the leftists, the Dems and the peaceniks on our backs no matter what we do.


116 posted on 04/29/2004 6:28:40 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
We lost....at least in Fallujah. We didn't loose because we don't have the military means, we lost because we don't have the guts to do what it would take to fix that stinkhole problem.

Too much politicking and diplomacy before the war has been won. The 'insurgents' will only be more bold, if they perceive a win. Somalia emboldened OLB to commit 9-11---bin Laden admitted that.
117 posted on 04/29/2004 6:29:54 AM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
Well, Bush agrees with you. The problem is that Iraqis run like scared rabbits when ever pushed to the front.
118 posted on 04/29/2004 6:30:17 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Weird knee jerking on this first page. Does the morning crowd have so little faith in the judgement of our military?
119 posted on 04/29/2004 6:30:32 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Too much politicking and diplomacy before the war has been won.

More likely, the politicking and diplomacy is being used to try and win the war.

JMO.

120 posted on 04/29/2004 6:32:27 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-337 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson