To: alaska-sgt
I hope it all comes out in the trial.
That being said, I don't understand Nichol's defense- "I am not guilty because there were lots of us involved in the plot..."
If I was a juror, I would say, "Thanks for the info on the others, but you are still guilty. Off to the electric chair for you."
To: 11th Earl of Mar
That being said, I don't understand Nichol's defense- "I am not guilty because there were lots of us involved in the plot..." I think NIchols is trying to prove that the Feds withheld evidence in the case, trying to prove obstruction, or an unfair trial perhaps.
It may work, as the FBI seems to have tampered with witness accounts, videotapes, and of course the crime scene itself was completely destroyed with heavy equipment only days after the bombing.
35 posted on
05/07/2004 2:41:30 PM PDT by
ovrtaxt
(Forget ANWR -- Drill Israel!)
To: 11th Earl of Mar
When the defense has the facts on their side, they pound on the facts,
When the defense has the law on their side, they pound on the law,
When the defense has neither the facts nor the law on their side, they pound on the table!
This is classic table pounding.
40 posted on
05/08/2004 6:09:08 AM PDT by
MindBender26
(For more news as it happens, news first, fast, 5 minutes sooner, stay tuned to FReeper Radio!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson