Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six die as suspicions of anthrax mount in northern city (Iraq)
iraq press ^ | 5/12/04

Posted on 05/12/2004 6:01:55 PM PDT by knak

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Shermy
A similar story-probably the same one-surfaced a few months ago,and turned out NOT to be anthrax. I think they even claimed the disease was contagious. Anthrax isn't-in the ordinary sense. You can get it from the spores,or from eating the meat of an infected animal,but you can't pass it on to someone else.
41 posted on 05/13/2004 8:47:20 AM PDT by genefromjersey (So little time - so many FLAMES to light !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
bflr
42 posted on 05/13/2004 9:01:04 AM PDT by cgk (Leftist spin: Baghdad Fell? Clinton's Army! Saddam Nabbed? Clinton's Army! Naked Iraqis? Bush's Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
I don't know about the others, but it's interesting the first victim was a shepherd.
43 posted on 05/13/2004 9:16:13 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
That would make sense. Anthrax is quite often associated with wool-and with sheepherders.
44 posted on 05/13/2004 9:41:26 AM PDT by genefromjersey (So little time - so many FLAMES to light !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

Shermy said: "A similar story-probably the same one-surfaced a few months ago,and turned out NOT to be anthrax." Shermy is correct - 'Bacillus anthracis disinformationus' is the real bug.


45 posted on 05/14/2004 5:27:21 PM PDT by PhilipRick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: knak

bump


46 posted on 05/15/2004 7:41:54 PM PDT by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pttttt
Some old reports, possibly worth revisiting.
47 posted on 05/15/2004 7:45:14 PM PDT by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: knak
"Six Iraqis died last week of a serious skin disease, which workers at the Republican hospital in Mosul, 400 kilometres north of Baghdad, said looks like the anthrax, "

OK, so a shepherd could get anthrax from a sheep. What accounts for the other 5 deaths? It can't spread person-to-person and yet 6 are dead (since MOST of the time it doesn't kill, probably dozens of others sick). What could account for so many catching it simultaneously?

48 posted on 05/15/2004 8:14:06 PM PDT by cookcounty (LBJ sent him to VN. Nixon expressed him home. And JfK's too dumb to tell them apart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak

Another waste of time. Story coming from the pajama patrol, leaked to the keystone cops and to the liberal media. Garbage, just like all their other crap.


49 posted on 05/15/2004 10:11:28 PM PDT by Iberian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak

Iraqpress.org is hardly "liberal". The registry of iraqpress.org ie "faten muheadeen" of
Uxbridge, England. "Faten muheadeen" rhymes with mujahideen so, iraqpress.org may be an Al Qaeda Cult disinformation outlet.


50 posted on 05/16/2004 7:11:14 AM PDT by PhilipRick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: knak

How long befor DUers and their media lackeys cry that Bush is the cause of this?


51 posted on 05/16/2004 7:13:54 AM PDT by twntaipan (demoncRATS are a threat to security of the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak; Peach; Dog; freeperfromnj; oceanview; cajungirl; opinionator; Ditter; netmilsmom; ...
It turns out that this report had already been discredited back on April 1, 2004. See http://www.promedmail.org, Archive number 20040401.0884.

The claim should never have appeared in a news article dated May 11, 2004. It was a recycled news story, already known to be false. (And the supposed contagiousness was a giveaway that it was bogus anyway.)

In the interest of putting false rumors to rest, I've pinged everybody who had posted to this thread.

52 posted on 05/16/2004 9:54:03 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell

Thanks.


53 posted on 05/16/2004 10:02:37 PM PDT by alnick (Mrs. Heinz-Kerry's husband wants teh-rayz-ah your taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell

Well, I'd normally complain quite profusely about a paper confusing actinomycosis with anthrax and 0 deaths with 6. But then again, unlike, the Boston Globe and Daily Mirror, at least they didn't purposely run a false story.


54 posted on 05/17/2004 12:21:09 AM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan

I am the registered Democrat and liberal who found the registry info re: iraqpress.org ie this info suggests that the story is purposeful disinformation by the Al Qaeda Cult which possibly answers the question at the end of the PROMed post cited by Mitchell.


55 posted on 05/17/2004 1:03:11 PM PDT by PhilipRick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell

Thank you for the update.


56 posted on 05/17/2004 6:08:19 PM PDT by bwteim ("Begin With The End In Mind")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: PhilipRick
I am the registered Democrat and liberal who found the registry info re: iraqpress.org ie this info suggests that the story is purposeful disinformation by the Al Qaeda Cult which possibly answers the question at the end of the PROMed post cited by Mitchell.

Thanks for pointing out the registry info.

I don't know if this article was simply very poor journalism or if it was intentional disinformation.

57 posted on 05/17/2004 6:46:32 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

*ping* -----


58 posted on 05/17/2004 7:45:37 PM PDT by cgk (Leftist spin: Baghdad Fell? Clinton's Army! Saddam Nabbed? Clinton's Army! Naked Iraqis? Bush's Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

A year before this report, in the same general area of Iraq [MOSUL]... might be why the press there is a bit edgy about anthrax:

MAY 12, 2003 : (REPORT: MOBILE LABS FOUND IN NORTHERN IRAQ NEAR MOSUL ) MOSUL DISCOVERY : Meanwhile, U.S. officials said the mobile laboratories were found at a bombed-out rocket and missile factory near Mosul in northern Iraq. One of the trailers was missing its canvas cover, wheels and plumbing — most likely taken by looters — but the essential parts, including a compressor and dryer needed to produce weapons grade anthrax, were intact. ---- "REPORT: "Dr. Germ" now in U.S. custody - U.S. says ‘Dr. Germ’ surrendered in Baghdad; Iraqi scientist conducted research that led to bioweapons, U.S. says ," by Miklaszewski, Tammy Kupperman, Robert Windrem, AP & Reuters staff, MSNBC NewsAlert, May 12, 2003

59 posted on 06/08/2008 10:14:01 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson