[Just mythoughts]

"Hey, lay off! Those archaeopteryx fossils were a bitch to carve."


Hey, I really like those archaeopteryx fossils.... its the ones in transition showing "fool" proof of evolution I want to see.


To give evolution credibility requires lack of order, and no given species. Something or someone has sure orchestrated a whole lot of specific species from pond scum to the evolving humanoid. Now I will grant you that there are many who display the MIND of evolution.

[Dimensio]

To give evolution credibility requires lack of order, and no given species.

1) Define "lack of order".

2) You are aware that there are a number of "species" that are very closely related to one another, such that Species A and Species B can produce viable offspring, Species B and Species C can produce viable offspring, but Species A and Species C cannot produce viable ofspring? Such occurances show that "species" is just a term we have invented to define when a group of organisms has more or less genetically isolated themselves from related organisms. It's not a predefined property of life forms.

Your statements do not expose flaws in evolution. They merely expose the flaws in your understanding of evolution.