[scripter]

While the article is two years old it hits the issues as if it were written today.

The article was copy and pasted from a Word doc. It's also available in PDF. See the originals for footnotes.

[scripter]

Ping.

[BenLurkin]

Q. What's next?

A. In addition to continued recruitment of "gay" children we will see other sexual "rights" advocated:

[longtermmemmory]

bump,

Surprised this was in ANY law review

[EdReform]

BTTT

What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)

Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues"

Culture of Vice

The Stamp of Normality

[AmericanChef]

Excellent indeed.

The reason why we can't discuss abuse in the homosexual context is that it points to environmental rather than biological factors in the "creation" of the homosexual, thereby damaging their position.

In too many cases, the homosexual has been exposed to domination or abuse, or lacks strong male or female figures. The abused then become the abusers. I don't see how it can be other than environmental.

Regardless of the cause, the real argument is what's best for society as a whole, and gay marriage ain't it. But, we need to get off the "sin" wagon, and speak of it in a social context if we're going to hold our ground, because civil unions are just as dangerous.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping - Looks like a comprehensive, excellent article. If scripter says it's good, you KNOW it's good!

I really like the first sentence [that's all I've read so far]:

If a lie is repeated often enough, those who hear it will begin to believe that lie is the truth.

That simple statement has many applications; it could be the motto of leftists. Note that although the article is two years old, sripter says it is 100% timely.

Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.

[King Prout]

datum.

[scripter]

As you will see, these articles suggest that this question [ whether homosexuality is associated with medical or psychological harm ] may be answered in the affirmative. However, this result was not what the Stanford editors wanted to promote, so these authors were later refused publication, while those who answered the question presented in the negative were published.

I very much encourage all to read the articles mentioned above. Here they are in PDF format:

• Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement
• Crafting Bi/Homosexual Youth
• Studies of Homosexual Parenting: A Critical Review
• Homosexuality: Innate and Immutable?
• Why NARTH? The American Psychiatric Association's Destructive and Blind Pursuit of Political Correctness
• Selling Homosexuality to America

[tuesday afternoon]

Bump for later read.