Skip to comments.A One-Time Bush Skeptic Admits His Error (Journalist Who Actually "Gets" It! Amazing!)
Posted on 06/02/2004 11:34:39 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
click here to read article
Is this really so hard to understand?
It is evident you don't read it.The barnicle is a scum sucking liberal rag, just ask anyone who has ever read it.
There isn't a Leftist in America who gets this concept - that sooner or later, all of these countries have to be taken out for us to win the war. Whether Bush did Iraq in the right order or not, it's just one piece of the puzzle, like taking Sicily before invading Italy in WWII. The Left's arguments against Iraq betray their true desire - for the US to just surrender to terrorism, in the hope that we can buy a few more years of peace.
They throw in his supposed weak intellect, yet the next noise eminating from a liberal's piehole places Bush as the mastermind of an evil plot to do "something." Note that the "something" is never clearly delineated, or if it is, there is never a hint of what the libs would DO to rectify the "problem."
And about thirty percent of the population willingly drinks the demoncratic Kool-Aid every time it is offered.
The 'Rats could have a field day if they honestly evaluated some of Bush's policies and offered real alternatives(and a candidate who is more animated than the typical corpse),but they are incapable of this.
I wouldn't say that someone who accuses the person most responsible for aggressively bringing the Cold War to a premature end (sooner than it would have otherwise) by fighting the enemy both directly and by proxy in places like Afghanistan, El Salvador, Grenada and Nicaragua as being timid and uncommitted to our nation's security "gets" it, but it's a nice piece nonetheless.
Come....come to the dark side my son....
An interesting article, and even more so given where it was printed.
It means something, though I'm not sure what. The five largest newspapers in this state are far more liberal than the population. The Houston paper is one or the worst two.
The two noebolshevik founders of moveon.org were on C-SCAM earlier this morning. One they wqere moved off their hate-spewing, half-truths and outright lies talking points these were two of the most vacant, idiotic people I have ever heard. The drug-addled looks in their eyes screamed out that the lights are on, but nobody's home.
My biggest problem with the WOT is that it seems to be a never ending war. How do we define what is terrorism, who is a terrorist and what we have to do to defeat it? I don't want the USA running around the world acting as a global policeman.
I've been reading about trying to get rid of the house of Saud, the Syrian government, the Iranian govenernment, North Korea, et al. When do we decide that we have finally won this war?
That sounds about right. The majority of them are , at least, politically illiterate. Most are morally bankrupt. That doesn't leave much to be desired.
About the same time we win the war against robbery, homicide, adultery and prostitution. That is, never. But that doesn't mean that the war shouldn't be fought.
Oh yes - Bush and his ol' oil buddies setting up this war for oil. As if a president of the U. S. would split families up, send our boys and girls into danger, see many killed and leaving children without parents merely to help his oil buddies.
I actually had someone say he sent them to war for revenge for "daddy". I told him if a U.S. president would send soldiers for personal revenge he should be impeached.