Replies

The following is the text of a message I left on the MediaWatch website. I'm not familiar with their politics, but reviewing their issues list, it seems pretty non-partisan. As of yet, there is no indication they have this on their radar screens as an issue.

Over the past few months, I've become increasingly disgusted with the treatment nearly all major news shows have presented in dealing with President Bush, the war on terror, Iraq & Afghanistan, and his policies in other areas. The bias is incredible, to the point of outright lying to the American public, and hiding other details which they refuse to report.

I've reviewed your website, and despite seeing many issues that do need attention, the case must be made for fair and balance reporting to the public, as opposed to the propaganda it is currently being served.

I hope you can begin some review of this situation, and bring some light to the failure of the news organizations to report facts accurately and without regard to any particular party or ideology.

It's a different approach than trying to change the advertisers or networks. FCC will be next.

I do like it. I think it's very catchy and grabs the site's attention. I will try any means necessary, short of violence, to get the truth published, even within the liberal media realm. Hopefully others will persist in their endeavors in dealing with this issue. I just hope common sense will endure and the knowledge of the dangers this liberal media pose with their rhetoric. Thank you

I'm not familiar with their politics, but reviewing their issues list, it seems pretty non-partisan.

Yeah, right. I took a look because of your post. Some rationality (against describing how to kidnap young girls),
but plenty of irrational (against wondering if victims of sexual abuse "put out more") kneejerk responses.

That's just two of the top stories. Go to the "alternative periodicals" and "Bunny Huggers Gazette" stands out, and
a lot of lesbian, black, multicultural pubs.

No TAS or National Review.