Skip to comments.
Military Bases in Germany
New York Times ^
| June 14, 2004
| Editorial
Posted on 06/14/2004 6:34:32 AM PDT by OESY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: OESY
Personally, if the NY Times thinks it's a bad idea - that's enough to convince me it's a great one. Once again they leap to the conclusion that it is
we who need to improve our relationships with Old Europe. I suggest the onus is on them. They're the ones with limping economies, rampant unemployment and schizophrenia about the E.U.
Allied are countries that stand by you even when it's not in their obvious & immediate interest. They do so to preserve and enhance the long-term relationship. Germany and France have failed the test. They are no longer allies.
We need to reward our allies and penalize those who oppose us. Other countries will understand that and think twice about comparing us to Hitler or abusing an undeserved seat on the UNSC to thwart us.
To: OESY
Germany needs an Ambassador that speaks only english and french, not troops especially armored troops.
42
posted on
06/14/2004 9:34:35 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: Michael81Dus
Last data 9 october 2003
4019 polish troops around the world, mostly Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Bosna, Kosovo and Afghanistan. Pretty good contribution for such young democracy. They were engaged before as well in Israel and all other peace missions.
Now you can write number of German troops.
43
posted on
06/14/2004 9:35:34 AM PDT
by
Lukasz
(Hey don't look for my horrible mistakes, I'm learning English here!)
To: Dilbert56
Yep, NYT is trying to cover for the German socialists' anti-American behaviour, so they can slap us in the face and not pay the consequences.
We should reward Poland and the other new EU states along with other countries brave enough to stand up to the Islamofascists...
If the NYT is for something, i am immediately suspicious -- if i used to hold the same views they espouse, i'll quickly re-examine my views -- i must have missed something if i end up on the same side as the Slimes...
44
posted on
06/14/2004 9:44:30 AM PDT
by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: Lukasz
7,750 men and women mostly in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, but also in Georgia, at the Somali coast line, Ethiopia, Eritrea.
Good job, I´ve met Polish paratroopers two years ago, they were kind and well trained.
To: STFrancis
ping
Not election related, but interesting.
46
posted on
06/14/2004 10:02:29 AM PDT
by
longjack
To: Redbob
At least you had only good things to say about them.
Some of my comments from my nearly 6 years there aren't quite as nice.
But the closer to the border you got, the nicer they were to us GI's.
47
posted on
06/14/2004 10:04:19 AM PDT
by
Eagle Eye
(Coming to you live from HESCO city...)
To: OESY
The large American military presence in Germany has long symbolized the understanding at the heart of NATO Washington's commitment to remain permanently engaged in Europe's security and to integrate its military operations with those of its major European allies. Recent history has only reinforced how important that relationship is to the United States. NATO is the only alliance capable of sharing some of the global military burdens that have now overstretched America's ground forces. NATO was created to "Keep the Russians out and the Germans down". Hence the continued occupation of Germany and the lack of a peace treaty 60 years after the end of WWII. The Bundesrepublik government is an instrument of the four occupying powers, not the actual German government in the sense of a constitutional authority with powers from the nation.
To: Eagle Eye
Where were you when you were in Germany?
I was at Merrill Barracks, Nuernberg, and Kelley Barracks, Stuttgart.
49
posted on
06/14/2004 11:11:39 AM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out)
To: Recovering_Democrat
The Nery York Slimes left out the fact that when Gore reorganized government during the Clinton Administration, 800,000 military personnel were cut. The NYT was silent then so now during the Bush Administration closing a few bases becomes important to them.
To: OESY
It is telling that the objections that the
NY Times musters against this are (1) political, and (2) economic. The truth is that we are attempting to overcome an overreliance on both of those factors that has existed in the past with regard to military deployment, and it isn't an easy thing to do. Many of those bases were placed where they were (as they have been in the United States as well) for reasons other than military utility.
But these are luxuries we can no longer afford. These redeployments are NOT being done to punish anyone despite the Times' persistent efforts to blame this and everything else on Bush. They have been on the drawing board since the Reagan administration.
To: OESY
such moves will have depressant effect on the morale of military families, absent soldier-family separation as a consequence of deploymentI was a military brat, and aware of the prestige and the Plum posting that Europe was for families.
But it is now a decade since the end of the Cold War, and we have other priorities.
It is the military's mission to respond to those priorities.
Good military families will have good morale. And they will buck up and do their duty whereever their men are posted.
52
posted on
06/14/2004 12:36:16 PM PDT
by
happygrl
(The democrats are trying to pave a road to the white house with the bodies of dead American soldiers)
To: OESY
We should move ALL US troops OUT of Germany. What's the point of keeping them there? The Cold war is over and now the Germans can take care of themselves.
53
posted on
06/14/2004 12:50:27 PM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4!)
To: Redbob
Inside every German is a Nazi dying to come out.
54
posted on
06/14/2004 12:52:24 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Baumholder, Gelnhausen, Butzbach, and some NATO sites up north. And those are just places I was stationed, actually got to see a bit more of the country side than that, including Hohenfels, Graf, and a lot of other places along the way.
55
posted on
06/14/2004 12:57:29 PM PDT
by
Eagle Eye
(Coming to you live from HESCO city...)
To: OESY
The Pentagon is proposing sharp cuts in U.S. forces in Germany
FINALLY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
56
posted on
06/14/2004 1:01:11 PM PDT
by
sawmill trash
(NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!!)
To: OESY
The large American military presence in Germany has long symbolized the understanding at the heart of NATO
...the understanding that the USA will bail our butts out if the commies show up coming throught the pass.
What the he!! has NATO done for us ?
Let em cover their own defense expenses and quit bleeding us for it.
57
posted on
06/14/2004 1:03:37 PM PDT
by
sawmill trash
(NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!!)
To: OESY
The Socialists at the New York Times are sure quick to support their fellow Socialists running Germany.
58
posted on
06/16/2004 9:25:03 AM PDT
by
RJL
To: Eagle Eye
"...got to see a bit more of the country side than that, including Hohenfels, Graf, and a lot of other places along the way."And don't forget Wildflecken ... the only place in the world where it didn't matter which direction you were walking, it was always uphill.
59
posted on
06/16/2004 9:29:39 AM PDT
by
BlueLancer
(Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmändø (EMØØK))
To: Cannoneer No. 4
I was at Merrill Barracks, Nuernberg.... When were you at Merrill, I was there 79-82 with the 116th Ord. Co. Regards!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson