Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recovering_Democrat

"It's a bad idea, particularly at a time when the United States is struggling to rebuild its relations with its NATO allies."

Aren't the proposed new host nations for American military installations in Eastern Europe also members of NATO?

It isn't even that I disagree with the Slimes position on most things, it has become that they are so bad at promoting their agenda - they could at least leave out the obviously erroneous or illogical.


4 posted on 06/14/2004 6:43:15 AM PDT by Let's Roll (Kerry is a self-confessed unindicted war criminal or ... a traitor to his country in a time of war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Let's Roll
Add this to your list:

But the Pentagon does seem to have a growing preference for stationing troops either at home or on the territories of allies ready to embrace President Bush's notions of unilateral preventive war.

If allies are embracing it, then how can it be unilateral?

6 posted on 06/14/2004 6:49:24 AM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Let's Roll
I don't think the NYTs complained when all the bases were closed and military dependents came home from Japan in the 1960s and 1970s.
btw, I didn't know NATO was still breathing.
7 posted on 06/14/2004 6:51:35 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (STAGMIRE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Let's Roll

"they could at least leave out the obviously erroneous or illogical."

What would that leave them?


21 posted on 06/14/2004 7:19:25 AM PDT by bad company (God speed Dutch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson