You said you found the evidence overwhelming on both sides of the debate. What did I misinterpret? Also, I'm trying to understand how arriving after the discussion has been going on for a while has something to do with the statements made during the discussion. Did you retract a statement of yours somewhere along the line, and I missed it? 
Not at all.
The debate that I'm talking about (and the title of the thread) is the question of homosexuality being behavioral or genetic. I find convincing arguments on both sides of that argument although I tend to lean in the 'genetic' direction as to cause.
But, maybe I'm the one that misunderstood. What did you mean by the pro-homosexuality side?
>>What specific points on the pro-homosexuality side do you find overwhelming? <<