Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KC_Conspirator
It is very typical. Pretty boys don't do well with girls.

You need to understand that to look "pretty" you have to be feminine. Feminine men do poorly with females.

The Pretty boys generally end up with one of two types of females. The first is what Kerry got... a fat girl whose looks and attitude limited her choices. The other type of female Pretty Boys get are those with Lesbian tendencies. The lesbian leaning female is attracted to "pretty" just like men are.

Clinton is a lot of things... bad.. but he is a man.. Put Billy Boy in a contest with Edwards for 10 females and William the conquerer will get 9 of them. Edwards would only get the 10th one because she was tired of waiting her turn with Bill. (Bill would take them in pretty order.. and pretty more often than not pretty)

174 posted on 07/09/2004 9:43:49 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Common Tator

They should simply "Shut Up And Sing", as Laura would say.


177 posted on 07/09/2004 9:46:03 AM PDT by b4its2late (John John Kerry Edwards changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
re: pretty boys and What Women Want

A woman might hang a picture on a wall of a Beautiful Man, but won't ride in his car. Clinton made time by making women believe that she was the Only One In The Room for Him. This is the nature of charm.

You know what has always crossed my eyes? The fact that pretty homosexuals are attracted to pretty homosexuals, and masculine women (lesbians) attracted to other manly girls. It would seem, on the face of it, that homosexual men would want a masculine partner, and a lesbian would want a feminine one. Yet, they try to outdo one another in a frantic imitation of the opposite sex.

Men tend to eroticize lesbians--they think they look like Sharon Stone, when they look more like Oliver Stone. But women make chums and shopping buddies of their homosexual male chums.

181 posted on 07/09/2004 9:51:18 AM PDT by Mamzelle (for a post-neo conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
You need to understand that to look "pretty" you have to be feminine. Feminine men do poorly with females.

They will pick up feminists as well. I guess its the whole "metrosexual" thing. But liberals think that is what attractive about men - they think Micheal Kinsely is manly.

I do agree with you about Klinton. Although he was a band major, he could still act a little manly, like playing gold and smoking cigars.

228 posted on 07/09/2004 10:21:38 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
"It is very typical. Pretty boys don't do well with girls."

Agreed. SOME are too feminine, but the REST just can't stand a woman as or more attracive then they are competing with them in the admiration dept. Their egos are definitely more fragile than average looking men. At least, that was always my experience.

Hubby isn't UNattractive, but nobody would honestly call him "pretty" either. He'd be the first to laugh.

245 posted on 07/09/2004 10:46:15 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
Clinton is a lot of things... bad.. but he is a man.. Put Billy Boy in a contest with Edwards for 10 females and William the conquerer will get 9 of them. Edwards would only get the 10th one because she was tired of waiting her turn with Bill. (Bill would take them in pretty order.. and pretty more often than not pretty)

Wrong, on so many levels - number one being that Clinton is not a man. Clinton is a bony-fingered, pasty-thighed freak that genuinely sensuous women would want absolutely no part of.

274 posted on 07/09/2004 11:31:47 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (They call it "PMS" because "Mad Cow Disease" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson