No, people who say they are "embarassed" or "outraged" by Buchanan's '92 speech - which was pure Reagan conservatism - are liberals. There wasn't an iota of isolationist sentiment in that speech . Read it. There was a time when Buchanan was a REaganite - Reagan hired him as communications director - - this speech reflected Reaganism. IF you disagree with any sentiment in that speech, please point it out. Otherwise, you might consider doing to your "pie hole" what, when you're angry, you've suggested others do with theirs.
Excuse me?
Everyone on this site knows you for what you are. A troll or a Buchananite and as far as I can tell, there's very little difference these days.
That you are defending someone who has definitely gone off the plantation since 1992 tells me everything I need to know about you. Now it all makes sense.