Certainly is typical of the type of person Isakson is to level last-minute attacks on Cain. You see, when you attack at the last minute, maybe people don't have time to find out the truth. Barbara Boxer, among others, is a master of that tactic.
It's also noteworthy that after all their research, a couple of bogus charges are the worst thing they could come up with about Herman Cain. Tells you he's a very solid individual with a clean past and hopefully a bright future in the US Senate.
>Certainly is typical of the type of person Isakson is to level last-minute attacks on Cain. <
As versed to Collins and Cain who have spent 4 months and $4 million attacking Isackson with half truths and inuendo.Didn't your mother ever tell you people who live in glass houses should not throw stones.
Excellent point about lack of ammo against Cain. Cain's career is an open book (in fact three books) and anyone who is interested in truth can easily research it. Unfortunately, most Cain haters aren't interested in any truth. Remember, it is easy to throw out an unsubstantiated accusation. The rebuttal always requires documentation.
I find it interesting the Cain haters hiding behind the $250 Cain gave to BOB KerrEy to mask the real reasons they oppose him. Do these people hate Reagan because of Iran/Contra. Do they hate Newt because of his affair. Do they hate Bush because he proposed the huge increase in government spending called Prescription drug benefit. Do they hate Isakson for voting against Bush's "Mexico City Policy." Do they hate Collins for voting with the pro-abortion Isakson on many issues. No, I doubt they do.
In fact they probably think the above list of things is ridiculous. Yes, they are right. It is ridiculous. Just as ridicules as hating Cain for contributing $250 to the profuseness BOB KerrEy.