To: I-53
This gal is the ultimate anti-Laura. As I recall, Laura Bush was on bed rest for quite some time to ensure a healthy birth for Barbara and Jenna.
50 posted on
07/18/2004 12:34:50 PM PDT by
I-53
(How public, like a frog)
To: NYC Republican
But now I'm going to have to move to Staten Island. Thought you might find this line of interest. Many Manhattanites fear having to move to Staten Island more than aborting their children.
To: I-53
298 posted on
07/18/2004 8:15:55 PM PDT by
cpforlife.org
(Abortion is the Choice of Satan, the father of lies and a MURDERER from the beginning.)
To: I-53
You know how liberals are always asking, "Do you really think women who "choose" abortion should be jailed and tired for murder?"
The answer is YES!
458 posted on
07/20/2004 6:47:02 AM PDT by
JDK
To: I-53
This gal is the ultimate anti-Laura. As I recall, Laura Bush was on bed rest for quite some time to ensure a healthy birth for Barbara and Jenna. Laura's pro-abortion. Frankly, I find her to be just as creepy.
477 posted on
07/22/2004 5:09:33 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: I-53
This is one of the most horrible things I've ever read. I'm with Mrs. Jennie Chancey here:
"Prepare for what is surely one of the most chilling articles ever to have been printed. This essay, recently published in the New York Times, is one woman's story of her "reduction" procedure, done to kill two of the babies in her womb when she found out she was carrying triplets. As I read through this, I kept waiting for the punch line. Surely the mother would see the barbarity of what she was doing and change her mind. Surely in the end her boyfriend would stop her from stopping two little heartbeats. But the conclusion is so disturbing it will leave you in disbelief as it did me. Lest we forget: Abortion on demand is not about the "life of the mother." It is not about health. If you entertain a notion that the "right" to abortion is about saving lives or preserving health, I pray you abandon that notion after reading this essay. Abortion on demand is at its heart about self-centeredness. It is about taking another person's life so that your own will not be bothered. Can we not see the far-reaching consequences of such a decision? Does the woman in the essay not realize that her cold-blooded "reduction" teaches the next generation to view all human life as disposable? What will happen when this woman is elderly and "in the way?" If we create a culture that devalues human life simply because a new baby will mean "I'll have to start shopping only at Costco and buying big jars of mayonnaise," then we are asking for a society that will murder its elderly, its lame, its blind, and all the other "unfit" members when they become inconvenient. God deliver us from such a fate. May we learn to treasure and value the precious gift of human life, training the next generation to see that cold-blooded murder is never justified. May we stand in the gap and take the initiative to help those women who are in the midst of a "problem" pregnancy, offering to share the expenses, adopt the child, train the mother...whatever it takes to prevent the "reduction" of human life. ~ Mrs. Chancey " read at: http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/ And here's what the murderer looks like: http://www.feminist.com/askamy/ Disgusting excuse for a human.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson