The drafts of the millenium report would have had different info then is in the final report, which still exists.
Berger apparantly purged the archives of all copies of those earlier drafts. There must have been something incriminating in those earlier drafts.
The idea that on two separate visits all the copies of the drafts are taken and later all the copies can't be found is completely ludicrous.
Bigger than Watergate, imo.
But it was an accident, you know? He accidently kept taking the same report over and over.
In or on... I am thinking that someone's handwritten scrawl on one of the drafts might be very very worrisome to a certain party or parties right now...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1175296/posts
Heard on the John Batchelor radio program tonight: John Loftus claims that documents removed from the National Archives by Sandy Berger contain information about the Clinton administration's hiring members of the Arab Brotherhood (?), an organization with Nazi and Al Qaeda connections, to terrorize Serbs during Clinton's war in the Balkans.
you are exactly right - all the 9/11 commission was left with were the "final" copies of the original draft and the ultimate report ... gone are all the working copies that circulated in which Clinton, Berger, et. al. would have included their own sentiments in their own writing alongside their own fingerprints ... not to mention all of the documents he stole the first time around destroyed that nobody stills know exactly what or which documents will never be seen again (and one presumes those are probably the most damning of the stolen evidence).
This is absolutely bigger than Watergate, but unfortunately the media is on the wrong side of this one. They were pushing for the fall of Nixon, but they're not going to help here, not the lamestreamers at any rate.
Bill and Sandy cut a deal? Sandy purges the incriminating infor and, if he is caught, Bill "takes care of him"? Why would Berger agree to such a risky proposal? Why would he trust Clinton? Berger could just as easily end up at room temperature (he still may). This is a strange story. And I agree -- bigger than Watergate by far.
Can anyone check and see what was in the memo-gate memo. If I remember correctly the dems wanted to use info from the commission to trash Bush. Is it just me, or does it seem that they are putting the plan into action despite the discovery of the memo? And why did the story on the content of the memo never go anywhere? Only the story of the evil Republicans that stole it.
Also the timeline:
October the employees do the sting after detecting missing docs in September. The October visit indeed results in missing docs.
Berger hires Breuer shortly after that (still October) and "finds" notes he had started taking in July. That's why Breuer came out with his bizarre "this is old news, it's a year old" spin today.
FBI comes on the case in January. That's when Joe Lockhart (Lord spare us, but evidently we'll be treated to hearing him during this investigation) was hired, too.
consensus bump
This is a man who committed a serious crime and it should be treated that way.
Joking minimizes the seriousness.
There is not a one among them that could be considered honorable or putting the security of their country ahead of personal agenda.
I agree. It's time for the Republicans to take advantage of the "special prosecutor" law that the Democrats were good enough to establish. It'll be fun to listen to the Democrats whine like they did during the Clinton-Lewinsky sex scandal.
I would think that there are microfilm back-ups.