Posted on 08/11/2004 7:48:17 AM PDT by ParsifalCA
Ive been receiving a lot of queries lately about things that did or did not happen during the time John Kerry and I served together in the Navy. Ive also received large quantities of reading material, mostly email and mostly unpersuasive, from people attempting to trash, for political purposes, his relatively brief combat service in Swift boats. I have also declined offers to join groups attempting to discredit him on the basis of his naval service.
As I have previously written, Kerry and I served together in USS Gridley (DLG 21) in 1967 and 1968. Gridley was a new guided missile frigate, later reclassified with the rest of the ships in her class as a guided missile cruiser. Ensign Kerry was First Lieutenant, the division officer in charge of the deck force consisting of about thirty sailors. I was a commander serving as executive officer, or second in command. The officers reporting directly to me were the department heads, mostly lieutenant commanders. John reported to the weapons officer, one of the department heads, but had daily direct contact with me because of his responsibilities for deck seamanship, the ships four boats and the external appearance of the ship and also because of his collateral duty as public affairs officer, a position I had previously filled in an aircraft carrier.
As I have said often and say again, John was a fine junior officer-- intelligent, responsible and hardworking. Moreover, he possessed these qualities in degrees not common in inexperienced ensigns. His fitness reports (evaluations) that I drafted for the captains signature reflected those qualities and more. He earned them.
We first received orders for Kerry to report while we were still deployed to the South China Sea and the Tonkin Gulf area. We had a rescue helo detachment on board, berthing was tight and we had no immediate need for another junior officer, so we decided that the best use of his services was for him to remain stateside filling required school quotas until we returned to Long Beach.
After a turnaround of less than eight months, Gridley deployed again in February 1968 with Ensign Kerry on board. Much of that tour, like the previous one, was spent on search and rescue duty, providing support to the carrier and assistance to downed aviators and aircraft in distress. We returned to Long Beach in June and Kerry left shortly after for Swift Boat training. He spent a little over four months on combat duty in the rivers of South Vietnam and was awarded the Silver Star, Bronze Star and three Purple Hearts. He left the Navy after his obligated service tour, joined the anti-war protest movement, entered politics and the rest, as they say, is history.
Kerry refers to his approximately one-year tour in Gridley as tedious. He has little to say about that one-third of his naval career because, he says, not much happened. You could have fooled me. I thought it was rather exciting. I have spoken with many of our former shipmates and they seemed to feel that we were actually doing something important back then. Im sure, however, that it seemed tame in retrospect compared to his four months on the rivers with the brown water Navy.
After much urging by former shipmates, I read Douglas Brinkleys account of Johns service in Tour of Duty (William Morrow: New York, 2004). In a chapter entitled High Seas Adventures (perhaps adventures is a bit strong, considering the tedium he experienced), Mr. Brinkley describes, in near heroic terms, Johns duties onboard Gridley. I may have forgotten some of the awesome responsibilities that we heaped upon Ensign Kerry, but Im sure that he handled those well, also. Theres a good deal of hyperbole in that chapter, but then a little exaggeration is normal, I guess, when it comes to describing the past exploits of presidential candidates.
Be all that as it may, John was a fine junior officer-- one of the best Ive served with. I cant comment on the four months or so on the rivers of Vietnam because I wasnt there. Others who werent there shouldnt comment on them, either. Nor will I second- guess his awards nor should anyone else unless they can prove for certain that the citations misstated the facts and that somebody lied. Thirty-five years later is no time to be questioning them. And besides, what does all of this have to do with his qualifications for president?
John Kerry spent less than a year and a half on sea duty, much less than that in the combat zone. Most of the rest of his service obligation was spent in school. His service to his country is commendable and his decorations attest to the quality of that service and to his bravery. To make this service the centerpiece of his presidential campaign thirty-five years later, however, is ludicrous.
Senator Kerrys credentials to be commander-in-chief of the armed forces are flawed by his anti-war protest activities while his comrades were still fighting and dying. They are further soiled by his outrageous accusations of atrocities committed by his comrades in a war in which belligerents posed as civilians.
A three-year tour of service, even heroic service, does not qualify one to be president. Of far more relevance is his nineteen years in the Senate, becoming its most liberal member and opposing most defense legislation. On this, his campaign is virtually silent and for very good reason: His record in public life contains little to commend it to voters concerned about the defense of the United States against international terrorism. CRO
J.F. Kelly, Jr. is a retired Navy Captain and bank executive who writes on current events and military subjects. He is a resident of Coronado, California.
copyright 2004 J. F. Kelly, Jr.
Kerry's service in Vietnam is a source of controversy because he makes it so.
Kerry's liberal agenda is a source of concern and the RNC should make it so.
Kerry's senate record is a source of his soul and the RNC should make it so.
Kerry's connection to Sandy Berger is a source of this man's intent and no one in the media makes it so.
Kerry's health is a source of concern yet no one in the media makes it so.
Interesting perspective, and carefully worded. However, I agree whole-heartedly with his conclusion. I wonder whether he will read "Unfit for Command," and what he will write then.
Does "honesty", "loyalty", "character", believing in God and Country etc ring a bell?
How anyone with an IQ over 50 can believe this traitor is Presidential caliber is beyond me. He is a proven liar, waffler, and anti American. I guess the old joke "are you going to believe me or your lying eyes" is appropriate to the useful idiots. (I really don't understand it).
I was in Vietnam, yada yada yada... I want to be President.
R E S U M E.......of ...... John Kerry
RESIDENCE: 7 mansions, including Washington, DC, worth multimillions.
EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE:
Law Enforcement. I voted to cut every law enforcement, CIA and defense bill in my career as a US Senator. I ordered Boston to remove a fire hydrant which I considered unsightly, in front of my mansion, thereby endangering my neighbors in the event of fire.
MILITARY:
I used three minor injuries to get an early discharge from the military and service in Vietnam(as documented by the attending doctor). I then returned to the US, joined Jane Fonda in protesting the war, and insulted returning Vietnamvets, claiming they committed atrocities and were baby killers. I threw my medals, ribbons, or something away in protest. Or did I? My book; VietnamVeterans Against the War: The New Soldier shows how I truly feel about the military. I deplore the military!
COLLEGE:
I graduated from YaleUniversitywith a low C average. Unlike my counterpart George Bush, I have no higher education and did not get admitted to Harvard nor graduate with an M.B.A
PAST WORK EXPERIENCE:
I ran for U.S.Congress and have been there ever since. I have no real world experience except that of a gigolo, by marrying rich women and running HJ Heinz vicariously through my wife Teresa.
SKILLS: Extremely good liar. Excellent at choosing rich wives.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
As a USSenator I set the record for the most liberal voting record, exceeding even Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton. I have consistently failed to support our military and CIA by voting against budgets, thus gutting our country's ability to defend itself. Although I voted for the IraqWar, now I am against it and refuse to admit that I voted for it. I voted for every liberal piece of legislation. I have no plan to help this country but I intend to raise taxes significantly if I am elected.
My wealth so far exceeds that of my counterpart, George Bush, that he will never catch up. I make no or little charitable contributions and have never agreed to pay any voluntary excess taxes in MA, despite family wealth in excess of $700 million.
I (we) own 28 manufacturing plants (Heinz) outside of the U.S. in places like Asia, Mexico and Europe. We can make more profit from the cheaper cost of labor in those Countries, although blame George Bush for sending all of the jobs out of Country.
Although I claim to be in favor of alternative energy sources, Ted Kennedy and I oppose windmills off Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard as it might spoil our view of the ocean as we cruise on our yachts.
RECORDS AND REFERENCES:
None.
PERSONAL
I ride a Serotta Bike.
My Gulfstream V Jet I call The Flying Squirrel.
I call my $850,000 42-foot Hinckleytwin diesel yacht the "Scarmouche."
I am fascinated by rap and hip-hop and feel it reflects our real culture.
I own several "Large" SUVs including one parked at my Nantucketsummer mansion, though I am against large polluting inefficient vehicles and blame George Bush for the energy problems.
PLEASE CONSIDER MY EXPERIENCE WHEN VOTING IN 2004.
i was worried there - until the end. The author, I believe is mistaken that Kerry "left the Navy" to protest the war. I thought he was still in naval reserves until 1979, long after the 2-3000 South Vietnamese which he said would die after the pullout of US troops were slaughtered 1000 times over.
Chalk another Naval Officer who served with Kerry who thinks he betrayed his fellow comrades
And Bush keeps saying he won't comment on Kerry's war record but wants to focus on his senate record. A good position to maintain and because of it, I can't wait for the debates.
It is pathetic that he hasn't done diddley squat in all of his years in the Senate then expects to become President based on 4 months of lies. What a country.
Excellent post. Loved it.
They are dead wrong.
This idea needs to be pushed big time
If Teresa wont trust Kerry with her money, why should we trust Kerry with our country?
Thanks...the Resume was sent to me in Email.....I added a couple of things.....so it is NOT MY original. But, it is GOOD!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.