Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MJY1288

FOFL!! .. That's for sure


232 posted on 09/07/2004 7:02:02 PM PDT by Mo1 (FR NEWS ALERT .... John Kerry over dosed on Botox and thinks he's Bob KerrEy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]


To: All

. . . just got home from yet another exhausting orientation session for new college students -- is school ever going to start?!


Before saying goodnight, I want to share with you the following article from Walter E. Williams:

[NOTE: As Williams indicates, the President is a man of great personal/political courage. We must honor his courage and do everything we can to repel the media's dispicable attempts to destroy him! Victory is within our reach . . . we must remain strong -- only 57 more days!!!]:


President Bush's Political Courage
Armstrong Williams
Monday, Sept. 6, 2004

Measure not the work
Until the day's out and the labour done,
Then bring your gauges.
– Elizabeth Barrett Browning

John Kerry casts himself with great force upon a role. On Monday Kerry is a brave Vietnam vet who speaks about his time in the trenches in calm gravitas. On Tuesday he is a fist-pumping anti-war protester who is denouncing his commanding officers and comrades as criminals. (If he was genuinely concerned about war crimes, he could have just turned himself in to a tribunal instead running for Congress in '72).

On Wednesday he finds God. Whatever it takes to ingrain himself in the popular culture — the real source of power in a democracy.

Of course, the one thing he can never be is authentic. This is becoming abundantly clear as his flip-flopping erodes his ability to argue passionately about any single issue.

President Bush provides an alternative. He does not flip flop. At times he seems almost bizarrely unconcerned with what the pollsters think. Some critics accuse the president of having too much cowboy swagger. Perhaps a better label would be political courage.

Whatever you want to call it, one thing is clear: While the Democrats exude weakness and indecisiveness on the issue of national security, Bush remains unwavering. During the recent Republican convention, Bush was moved to tears when recalling the pain he felt for the families who sacrifice their sons and daughters in this war (as were many of the attendees on the floor at Madison Square Garden).

Does anyone doubt the commander in chief when he declares, “We're staying on the offensive, striking terrorists abroad so we do not have to face them here at home”?

Can you say the same about Kerry?

The fault line between them is reminiscent of that which divided the two parties during the ’50s and ’60s. It was the Republicans who confronted the communist threat. They understood that if we failed to defend our own interests, our enemies would bring the war to us.

With the fall of communism and the period of peacetime expansion that followed, it felt good to pretend that our society had triumphed over external threats, that we had achieved something complete, decadent, enduring. But the reality is that there are people out there who spend their days trying to figure out how to kill as many Americans as possible. And we must be realistic about identifying and dealing with these threats.

Let’s not forget that there has not been a single terrorist attack on U.S. soil since this administration began taking it to the terrorists in earnest. We are winning this war. Building a pluralistic, democratic Iraq will facilitate the sort of strong economic ties that restrain future war. For the first time in 50 years, we have the chance to turn the Middle East into something other than an anti-American incubator of hate.

Every sensible legislator in this country — Republican and Democrat — realizes that. They read the intelligence reports coming out of the Middle East. I can’t tell you how often Democratic legislators confide to me that hey are grateful for Bush’s political courage.

This really represents quite a stunning change of events. Do you remember what the political climate was like when Bush took office? With the close election and questions of legitimacy floating around the zeitgeist, most political advisers urged Bush to scale back his campaign promises and focus instead on a small core of less ambitious issues. Shockingly, President Bush took the opposite approach. He mapped out a bold agenda for education and tax reform.

After September 11, that political courage and conviction crystallized into dominant leadership.

Last week our commander in chief again displayed his political courage by mapping out a domestic agenda that will redefine the traditional Republican message. His goals include increasing the funding for health insurance accounts for poor people, community health centers and hybrid cars; reforming our pension system, health care and the tax code and countless other initiatives that will further solidify his legacy as a transformational president.

In short, President Bush continues to present us with something that has become ever so rare in modern politics: genuine leadership.

www.armstrongwilliams.com

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/9/5/171323.shtml


233 posted on 09/07/2004 7:36:00 PM PDT by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson