I do not think this is where we want to go. You're suggesting Bush relies on the same type of bad judgement as Dan Rather? The same bad judgement being lambasted all over the internet for years and now the mainstream media?
We now know that Rather ignored key research of dissent from his thesis, notably Killean's wife and son. What research did Bush willfully ignore? Are you suggesting that Bush relied on possibly forged (or at least questionable) documents to make his case?
I see your point...but that wasn't my thought. I think that Rather truly believed these phony document were real. If were look at Rather's situation can we now say that Rather Lied. That is what they are saying about our Pres.