Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress caves in on weapons ban (Kansas City Star editorial)
KC Star ^ | Sep. 12, 2004

Posted on 09/12/2004 6:53:37 PM PDT by Former Military Chick

Posted on Sun, Sep. 12, 2004

Congress caves in on weapons ban

The gun lobby flexed its muscles, and congressional leaders blinked.

As a result, a 10-year-old ban on the manufacture and sale of assault weapons will expire at midnight Monday — unless Republican leaders in Congress change their minds.

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay says there's no reason to bring legislation extending the ban up for a vote because it doesn't have enough votes to pass.

That seems like a dubious claim. The House legislation has 136 co-sponsors, including Reps. Karen McCarthy, Richard Gephardt and William Clay of Missouri and Dennis Moore of Kansas.

House Democrats differ with DeLay; they say the votes are there for an extension. DeLay personally opposes the ban, however. But shouldn't the rest of the members of Congress go on the record as to whether they support or oppose the ban?

Maybe that's the rub. Since the 1994 legislation went into effect, the National Rifle Association has focused on congressional members who supported it. Several lawmakers lost re-election bids because of the NRA's opposition. And the NRA has opposed any extension or expansion of the ban.

Most Americans, however, support restrictions on the military-style weapons covered by the 1994 law. The nation's police officers have been among the strongest advocates of the ban.

And according to a survey by the non-partisan National Annenberg Election Survey at the University of Pennsylvania, 57 percent of people with a gun in their household are OK with banning the weapons, which became popular with criminals because they are designed to be shot from the hip and to fire many rounds in rapid succession.

One argument against the ban is that it simply created a market for weapons with similar features that weren't covered by the legislation. That's an argument, however, for expanding the ban — not eliminating it.

Congress has a chance to reduce the number of dangerous weapons on the streets. Too bad it is letting the chance slip away.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: awb; bang; banglist; congress; nra; tomdelay; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Cboldt

thanks for saving me from having to post the same question.

newspaper subscriptions are down across the country. Network news viewrship down. CNN viewership down. Fox News, up, up, up.

Do these mush head ever stop to think that their obvious bias might be causing their problems?


61 posted on 09/13/2004 12:13:52 AM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

62 posted on 09/13/2004 8:31:15 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
LoL.
63 posted on 09/13/2004 8:58:13 AM PDT by Happy2BMe (51 days until November 2nd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
"House Majority Leader Tom DeLay says there's no reason to bring legislation extending the ban up for a vote because it doesn't have enough votes to pass."

This is exactly what my Congressman (freshman Rep. Dr. Michael Burgess) told me recently;
hes said even the majority of dimocrats did not want renewal of the ban brought to the floor, because they know voting for a renewal would be political suicide anywhere in the country except the liberal coastlines.

64 posted on 09/13/2004 11:19:14 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Area51

Who is this "Karen McCarthy"?

She related to Rep. Carolyn McCarthy of New York?


65 posted on 09/13/2004 11:25:02 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
As if it were the sworn duty of Congress to violate the Second Amendment.....
66 posted on 09/13/2004 11:26:34 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Maybe he'll have to spend eternity with 72 Tayrayzahs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Notice how the author misstates the truth, while hysterically crying "Wolf"?

Same boilerplate histrionics as what they publish every time another state adopts "shall issue" concealed carry laws.

The result will be the same too, no actual increase in crime at all, but a probable reduction in crime.


67 posted on 09/13/2004 11:36:39 AM PDT by Richard-SIA ("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe; All

An excellent reply!

Ask Australia, England or Canada if the violent crime rate went down when "assault" weapons were banned.


68 posted on 09/13/2004 11:56:18 AM PDT by B4Ranch (´´Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the people´s liberty´s teeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson