Is this the beginning of 'Deep Buck' or 'Deep Buckhead'? That's enough wordspin for me I think...
If it's something the MSM wants to see (i.e. the Killian "memos"), it gets a cursory glance, a "looks good to me", and a "run with it."
If it's something the MSM doesn't want to see (i.e. irrefutable proof that the Killian "memos" are fakes), it's "Who came up with this and how does he know Karl Rove? What's his blood type? Who does he work for? Did he actually SEE someone create these fakes, or is it just pure conjecture?"
I'm sure there are far more members with direct ties to the Kerry campaign...it's just that their accounts don't seem to have a great life expectancy.
"Nor has anybody yet explained how the documents came to be so quickly and thoroughly refuted on a right-wing Web site not two hours after they were first revealed on CBS. The originator of the online discrediting of the Killian memos identified himself only as 'Buckhead,' but a little sleuthing on the Web site on which he posted his typographical criticism pulls up all his other postings and thus a lot more info about him. On the site [on screen MSNBC displayed a FreeRepublic.com page with a "Buckhead" posting], Buckhead claims he is a lawyer from the Atlanta area who participated last month in a meeting of lawyers for Bush-Cheney, an organization he said will be called upon in the event there are election irregularities and everybody winds up in court again. He says he has worked for a Congressman. He says he considers himself prominent in GOP legal circles in Georgia. So the Killian documents come out and are almost immediately questioned by a lawyer with Republican ties and are distributed to other news organizations without comment by the White House and they suddenly have one of their principal endorsers [Bobby Hodges] retract his endorsement. How many rats do you smell?"
'How many rats do I smell?' Let's see....
...Wait a minute!
You guys here are Republicans????
Keith, all your base belongs to us.