Interesting, but not exactly news. They've been peddling the same line since last week.
let them big a bigger whole
They don't really use the word "preponderance" right. I don't know how to describe where they went wrong with it, I just don't think it means what they think it means.
It sounds like they're using it to mean, "a host of other evidence", rather than a quantity of evidence which is slightly more likely then not.
Can anyone out there see what I'm saying? It's just not quite right.
This is bigger. Its a line drawn in the sand. They're joined at the hip with the DNC and have no where else to go.