Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Relied On Dems for Documents
RatherBiased.com ^

Posted on 09/17/2004 11:45:54 PM PDT by RatherBiased.com

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: Howlin
"I love the guy," Staudt said of Bush. "I'm so tired of this negative crap about him that I'd like to volunteer to build a barn and take you press guys out behind it and kick your asses." --- Walter Staudt

Another Great American.

61 posted on 09/18/2004 1:46:27 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

Looks like he should be playing the "Chuckie" doll in a horror flick.


62 posted on 09/18/2004 1:49:10 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud; jporcus; All

BINGO?
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/petoc.html
Texas Penal Code. Title 8
Chapter 37
--§ 37.09. TAMPERING WITH OR FABRICATING PHYSICAL
EVIDENCE.

--§ 37.10. TAMPERING WITH GOVERNMENTAL RECORD.

(PRETTY SURE AN ELECTION IS AN OFFICIAL PROCEEDING)
§ 37.09. TAMPERING WITH OR FABRICATING PHYSICAL
(1) alters, destroys, or conceals any record,
document, or thing with intent to impair its verity, legibility, or
availability as evidence in the investigation or official
proceeding; or
(2) makes, presents, or uses any record, document, or
thing with knowledge of its falsity and with intent to affect the
course or outcome of the investigation or official proceeding.
(b) This section shall not apply if the record, document, or
thing concealed is privileged or is the work product of the parties
to the investigation or official proceeding.
-

§ 37.10. TAMPERING WITH GOVERNMENTAL RECORD
1) knowingly makes a false entry in, or false
alteration of, a governmental record;
(2) makes, presents, or uses any record, document, or
thing with knowledge of its falsity and with intent that it be taken
as a genuine governmental record;

Would be interesting to get a prosecutor's view on this.
Or any atty really.


63 posted on 09/18/2004 1:54:52 AM PDT by ArmyBratproud (all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jporcus

see posts 60 and 63.

Sure looks like they broke Texas law....

Gotta wonder what an atty would think of that.


64 posted on 09/18/2004 1:56:48 AM PDT by ArmyBratproud (all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Looks good to me! Unfortunately, I am not a lawyer!


65 posted on 09/18/2004 1:57:48 AM PDT by jporcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
66 posted on 09/18/2004 2:05:56 AM PDT by igoramus987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The race is on to score an interview with Walter Staudt, the former commander of the Texas National Guard and the man the infamous CBS documents allege pressured Killian to "sugar coat" Bush's performance review. Staudt might be able to clear some things up for everyone, but story after story over the last few days has frustratingly reported that he won't return anyone's phone calls....

ABC News got the interview --

Speaking Out
Air National Guard Colonel Denies Bush Got Preferential Treatment
ABCNEWS.com
Sept. 17, 2004— The man cited in media reports as having allegedly pressured others in the Texas Air National Guard to help George W. Bush is speaking out, telling ABC News in an exclusive interview that he never sought special treatment for Bush. [SNIP]

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/Politics/Vote2004/staudt_bush_040917.html
67 posted on 09/18/2004 2:24:55 AM PDT by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
the DNC seemed "afraid to do what I suggest."

How low do you have to be when even the DNC turns up it's nose??

68 posted on 09/18/2004 3:32:48 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

http://www.texaspopulists.com/

David Van Os then gave a rousing speech about the need to reactivate the base of our state Party and what must be done to revitalize it. He discussed the potential upcoming Communication Workers of America (CWA) strike against SBC, due to SBC’s insistence that the union concede on some health care benefits. He attributed the decline of the Texas Democratic Party to the Party neglecting to organize its base, while pursuing the “mythological swing vote”, resulting in a “continuing spiral of losses”. David encouraged us to look to our legacy of great leadership from past Democrats such as Harry Truman, Ralph Yarborough, Glen Maxey, James Stephen Hogg and Jim Hightower, leaders who ran as populists, not away from that tradition.

Our featured speaker was Jim Hightower, who spoke of his mixed emotions as he watched our Congressional Democratic leadership in Washington.
......................................................
Bill Burkett's lawyer, Van Os/..Part of the Molly Ivins Texas dem "progressives"


69 posted on 09/18/2004 3:34:24 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Texas-Democrats/message/7278

Fellow Progressive Populist Caucus Members:

Our brother, Bill Burkett is under siege by the Carl Rove smear machine. Bill
is a charter member of the PPC and our friend.


70 posted on 09/18/2004 3:39:45 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Bonaparte, thank you so much for the list; I intend to mail my caustic message to American Express with a bcc. to all other sponsors for ease of message and time! I've had such a fine time each day mailing CBS directly--using different names for the acronym--criminal, castro, etc.

Best regards as always . . . Penny

71 posted on 09/18/2004 4:25:05 AM PDT by Penny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
Please, please, please pursue Cleland in unearthing the name of the contact person in the DNC that he says he gave Burkett. From there, a trail to criminal activity in the DNC and CBS exists--of this I'm certain!

Regards . . . Penny

72 posted on 09/18/2004 4:30:37 AM PDT by Penny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
It is truly fascinating to watch it all unfold. The scale of this scandal is so massive it's undeniable.

But I don't know if it is going to result in changes for the better. I feel that part of Dan's delusion is he thinks he's impartial on the air, even though he is obviously consumed by his bias.

Call me cynical, but I think news organizations will see his inadmission to tilting to the left as Rather's downfall, not his acceptance of bad data. I suspect they will just continue to become more openly partisan...so if you are conservative, you will watch one channel, liberal another.

And the 'facts' will rarely surface in such an environment. Instead it will be all about personalities like Carville or "Bow-Tie Boy" or whomever and how well they can "spin" and "slam", not about events. We already see so much of this now. Soon, the news will be 24 hour campaign commercials.

WTH ever happened to "reporting"?

73 posted on 09/18/2004 4:33:31 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

The first time I looked quickly at the picture, I thought it was Tim Russert.


74 posted on 09/18/2004 4:34:04 AM PDT by Bernard (Let Freedom Reign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

Love the MSM feeding frenzy!
Everyone ganging up on CBS and Dan Rather – not because he’s a fraud, but because they want the market share. I don’t really care why, I just like that it is happening.


75 posted on 09/18/2004 4:40:28 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

You got that right. It's so juicy even the media that normally protects lefties are going for the jugular.


76 posted on 09/18/2004 4:40:34 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
Burkett's a bonehead. If he did come up with this screwy idea, why do I think he had help? Like one of those won't-somebody-rid-me-of-this-meddlesome-priest deals?

Burkett needs to be subpoenaed in any case. Last time I checked forgery was still a crime in the good ol' US.

77 posted on 09/18/2004 4:40:34 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
Saturday, when all the news that's fit to bury gets in the papers.

I love Saturdays.
78 posted on 09/18/2004 4:40:35 AM PDT by snooker (French Fried Flip Flopper still Flouncing, be careful out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

Awesome comment by Staudt. A real Texan, like GW.


79 posted on 09/18/2004 4:42:05 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
Gaw! It looks like he's wrapping the mobile home in brick. See in the front?
80 posted on 09/18/2004 4:42:14 AM PDT by Jaysun (Taxation WITH representation isn't so hot either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson