[traviskicks]

I wish Dan Rather would go back on O'Reilly.

O'Reilly: If you forge documents are you a forger?
Rather: Well, no I wouldn't go that far Bill.
O'Reilly: (incredously) If you forge documents your not a forger?!? Really?
Rather: Some people might make a mistake and forge them once or twice, but I wouldn't give them that label, no.
O'Reilly: But these documents were forged with the intent to bring down a sitting President in a time of war.
Rather: I'd like to break that story if it's true.
O'Reilly: If they turn out to be forged you wouldn't label the person who forged them a forger? Or at least a criminal?
Rather: No, Bill I wouldn't. I mean, you have to look at the seriousness of these allegations. There are questions that need to be answered. The criminal here may turn out to be Bush.
O'Reilly: (punches Rather)

[Cboldt]

Cute post ... One correction, the last line should be:

O'Reilly: (agrees with Rather)

[LisaS]

You made this up, right?
You've brilliantly captured how O'Reilly and Rather would put their words.

Thank you for making my morning fun:)

[montomike]

Please replace O'Reilly with Brit Hume.