Well sure, that's the point I suppose. But implicit in what you say is that his previous positions were self-serving lies mentioned in passing to gain tactical advantage. Nixon, without the Nixonian gravitas.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
Kerry hasn't changed at all. He has finally revealed himself as the anti-war, foreign nation loving pacifist that he has always been. What you're seeing now is the true sKerry. If by some miracle, he were elected, I think he would pull our troops out of Iraq.
Well sure, that's the point I suppose. But implicit in what you say is that his previous positions were self-serving lies mentioned in passing to gain tactical advantage. Nixon, without the Nixonian gravitas.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
Personally, I am of the opinion that if Kerry somehow manages to win the election, he will find himself unable to pull troops out like he wants (seeing as he has a poor exit strategy) and will end up turning the affair into a real quagmire.
My other fear is that it is a Kerry Administration that would bring about the much worried about "draft" we keep hearing about. The Bush Administration is well aware of the fact that a professional volunteer army is far better than a drafted one. I don't believe the same can be said about the Democrats. Kerry will go in with no plausible exit strategy and no strategy for actually winning, thus stirring up a quagmire that, from a Democrat point of view, will require more troops.
It's just a hunch but I don't doubt that it could happen for a second.