Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can men respect women if they're trained to be perverts?
WorldNetDaily ^ | 10/18/04 | Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Posted on 10/18/2004 6:43:11 PM PDT by wagglebee

In a culture that sexualizes women constantly, the line between water-cooler chat and harassment is increasingly thin.

Bill O'Reilly, the conservative talk-show host whose "The O'Reilly Factor" is the highest-rated cable news show, has been sued for sexual harassment by his former producer Andrea Mackris. Mackris alleges that on many occasions, both in person and over the phone, O'Reilly engaged in lewd and lascivious conversation against her will. She goes so far as to state that O'Reilly unlawfully engaged in, and gratified himself with, phone sex, with Mackris on the other end of the line.

To be sure, O'Reilly enjoys the presumption of innocence in the suit, until proven otherwise. I personally respect and greatly enjoy O'Reilly as a broadcaster and I am sorry to see his public standing undermined by these allegations. While some of the content of Mackris' affidavit seems possible, readers of it will discover that other parts seem directed squarely at Roger Ailes, the chairman of the Fox News Channel, thereby undermining her credibility. Furthermore, Mackris does not explain why she didn't just hang up when O'Reilly allegedly harassed her repeatedly over the telephone.

Be that as it may, this sordid and sorry tale brings to the fore all that is wrong with our increasingly perverse culture. The question that the growing phenomenon of sexual harassment in the workplace raises is this: Can we really expect to have a healthy office environment, where men treat women as colleagues and intellectual equals, when everywhere else in the culture women are being so completely sexualized?

Is it realistic to ask men to separate what they see on television and in magazines from their interactions with women in the boardroom? With men being deluged in virtually every electronic medium with the message that women want to be recognized for their bodies rather than their brains, is it reasonable to expect that men will suddenly think differently the moment a woman dons a business suit?

Never in history have women been so sexually exploited as they are today.

College girls expose their breasts in exchange for a T-shirt on the "Girls Gone Wild" videos. MTV has transformed the women's music industry away from an emphasis on vocals and toward an emphasis of cleavage. Posters of Victoria's Secret models, dressed in thongs and the most revealing lingerie, line our mains thoroughfares, billboards and buses. Are men really expected to shut all this off the moment they stand in front of a copy machine?

Can we really expect a pure office environment to emerge from a degenerate culture? Indeed, in an environment where everything from the Internet to sporting events is sexualized, it even becomes difficult to determine what exactly constitutes harassment in the work place.

Let's see. If a man watches "Sex and the City" and, knowing that his female colleagues love the show, mentions at the water cooler how much he enjoyed the previous night's episode of Samantha giving a stranger oral sex, is it harassment? Or is it small talk?

And let's say a boss comes into the office after watching the Super Bowl and asks his secretary if she saw Janet Jackson's breast pop out during the half-time show, is he making lewd and inappropriate comments? What if a guy sees some new movie about sex and comments on the nude love scene – is that harassment? And if it is, can we at least recognize that we have made a huge portion of American culture off-limits in the workplace, because of how perversely sexualized it has become?

So that I am not misunderstood, let me make it clear that my purpose here is not to let men's boorish, and possibly illegal behavior, off the hook.

On the contrary. I wish that all men were gentlemen, behaving in a dignified and refined manner, especially around ladies. And I also wish that it didn't take the threat of legal action to get them to behave as gentlemen. Lewd comments on the part of lecherous men is the last thing that women should have to tolerate.

But let's acknowledge the incredibly mixed, contradictory and unfair signals that are being given to men. In life outside the office, men's lechery is encouraged in order to persuade men them to watch television or part with their cash. Near-naked twins sell them beer, women in thongs advertise the Miss America pageant, and Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera simulate masturbation in coming attractions for their shows on HBO and Showtime.

After being fed the idea in every corner of the culture that women primarily desire sexual attention, these men are expected to believe that women are going to be insulted, rather than complimented, by uncouth comments about their bodies.

What complicates the question of harassment is the fact that women are being subtly conditioned to use their sexuality to get ahead in the office. No less a branding genius than Donald Trump advised women on "The Apprentice" to play up their sexuality in commercial settings in order to gain power over men. Many women fall for this degrading advice by coming to the office dressed like streetwalkers. Dress codes today are considered outmoded and draconian, and fashion dictates that many women wear blouses cut very low and skirts cut very high. Yet men are expected not to notice. A woman's breasts can be spilling out of her blouse at a board-meeting, and men are expected to see her intelligence.

On my radio show, one man called in to say that there is a woman who works right across from his cubicle who wears see-through blouses nearly every day. "She's essentially wearing only a bra in the office, and I often have to put my hand in front of my face to block her out to stop myself from staring."

I am not blaming the victims or insinuating that women are inviting harassment. Far from it. No matter what they are exposed to and no matter how women dress, men must be in control of themselves and treat women as dignified and intellectual equals. I have never, and will never, excuse boorish behavior. But that does not change the fact that sexual harassment in the workplace is being vastly increased by a culture that both fosters the idea that women are primarily sexual objects, and that puts no emphasis on men and women dressing modestly and professionally.

And you can be sure that until such time that the sexual exploitation of women is reversed – and women reclaim their dignity by refusing to be portrayed on television and the Internet as the lecherous man's playthings – the number of women who have to suffer through male crudity is only going to increase.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billoreilly; boteach; rabbishmuley; rabbishmuleyboteach; sexualharassment; shmuleyboteach
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-193 next last
To: wagglebee

Oh, and Schmuley, bother to notice the way the chick dresses--darned near up to her chin. Male feminists like Bill will try to get up a woman's dress no matter what she wears. And the rest of the Homer Simpsons in our rotten society will cheer them on. That is, until someone like Bill tries to get in Homer's daughter's panties.


81 posted on 10/18/2004 7:29:29 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
She goes so far as to state that O'Reilly unlawfully engaged in, and gratified himself with, phone sex, with Mackris on the other end of the line.

So why the hell didn't she hang up the phone????

82 posted on 10/18/2004 7:31:14 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly

"Any man in America who makes any sexual references whatsoever in an office environment is asking for trouble."

This is absolutely true. And any man with any sense who has ever worked in the corporate world knows it. This is why I initially thought this entire harassment charge was bull. I could not imagine O'Reilly, with a pretty wife and kid, being this dumb.

At this point, Im willing to concede that there was probably some consenual aspect to this.

But the harassment is still bull. I do not think a smart, accomplished career woman from New York, a tough competitive town, especially in the media biz, would be vicitmized as she claims. A woman who has been around the block more than once knows how to handle an agressive, boorish type like O'Reilly, and, keep her job. Women...am I wrong?

Now, reading transcripts of the lawyers statements...it is obvious this is a major hit effort on Fox, with Soros and /or the DNC probably footing the bill.

If its a political hit job, there wont be any incentive for Mackris to settle out of court early on. We'll see.


83 posted on 10/18/2004 7:31:15 PM PDT by Dat Mon (clever tagline under construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: irv

People have dealth with worst things..I use to work in a hospital Emergency Department. One Doc was a Major Coke head, he would be doing lines of cocaine in his private office while the ER had rape patients drug overdoses and when we would all scream at him to get his as--s out there he would cuss the whole department out..

He went on to be a Medical Commentator on a L.A news channel


84 posted on 10/18/2004 7:33:18 PM PDT by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: missyme

Well, at least he's only BSing people rather than examining them.


85 posted on 10/18/2004 7:34:51 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (I FINALLY updated my FReeper page! Click on my name and see how you can help our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DefCon

Woman: "Ohhh, you were so good in bed last night..."
Benny Hill: "Thanks! I taught myself..."

86 posted on 10/18/2004 7:34:52 PM PDT by weegee (Ted Kennedy, your brother defined Vietnam antiwar protesters as traitors, giving aid to Ho Chi Mihn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

That's Zorro! :)


87 posted on 10/18/2004 7:34:52 PM PDT by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: missyme

"Zorro"?!

I love it!


88 posted on 10/18/2004 7:35:28 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (I FINALLY updated my FReeper page! Click on my name and see how you can help our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Well, I wouldn't say O'Reilly is a liberal either.

He's leftwing on some issues, rightwing on others.

This is a textbook, real, centerist.


89 posted on 10/18/2004 7:35:37 PM PDT by swilhelm73 (Democrats and free speech are like oil and water)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Turk82_1

Two words: Hate crime.

Two more: Racial discrimination

Both of these are predicated on how a person feels...in the first, the perp...the second, the 'victim'

I somewhat agree with the first. The second I have some question with. What really bothers me about the first is behavior is often a crime regardless of the 'feelings' of the victim, but the degree of the crime and the punishment is greater depending on the victim's ethnicity.

I'm not a lawyer and don't want to get into legal definitions, but to me 'sexual harassment' is truly unique. The exact same exclusively VERBAL behavior by the exact same person toward exactly the same other person can on one day be 'harassment' and on another be not only okay but welcomed and encouraged (or as in Arnold's words, 'playful'), depending on the feelings of 'victim'.

90 posted on 10/18/2004 7:37:59 PM PDT by ml1954 (Kerry, A Legend In His Own Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Lot's of Crazy things go on in hospitals

3:am in an ER with Doc's Nurses and Cops anything is possible..,


91 posted on 10/18/2004 7:38:08 PM PDT by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: missyme
People have dealth with worst things.

Sure. My only point was that it can be pretty hard. Personally, I thought she should have pressed charges on the SOB and let the chips fall where they may.

92 posted on 10/18/2004 7:38:17 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Bill Clinton, "Depends on what your definition of words are.. hah hah hah.."
93 posted on 10/18/2004 7:39:14 PM PDT by SunnySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

I used to laugh my ass off watching Benny Hill.


94 posted on 10/18/2004 7:39:17 PM PDT by DefCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: missyme

I have a hard enough time with these 12-hour shifts. I've heard of 16-18-hour shifts in the medical profession.

YIKES!


95 posted on 10/18/2004 7:39:48 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (I FINALLY updated my FReeper page! Click on my name and see how you can help our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

There are certain women at work I will not even talk too. I ignore them. It is the only safe thing to do. And I'll not be offering them any slots in my department either. I trust my judgment of character, everytime. I have enought problems without having to deal with the her-ass crap.


96 posted on 10/18/2004 7:41:07 PM PDT by glasseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Can women respect men when they are constantly portrayed as ignorant, stupid, self-centered, sex obsessed morons in sitcoms?


97 posted on 10/18/2004 7:42:03 PM PDT by ml1954 (Kerry, A Legend In His Own Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Night Shifts are always a different working world then day timers..You learn to put up with alot when you have only had 4 hrs sleep!


98 posted on 10/18/2004 7:44:49 PM PDT by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: ml1954

"Can women respect men when they are constantly portrayed as ignorant, stupid, self-centered, sex obsessed morons in sitcoms?"

Only if and when the male writers stop writing the characters in such ways. (hmmm)



99 posted on 10/18/2004 7:45:07 PM PDT by SunnySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
...the site of the IRS was also a solid mass of bordellos.

What a shame when a neighborhood deteriorates.

100 posted on 10/18/2004 7:45:38 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson