Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bahbah

Do we really think the UN (that idolizes Klinton) would not change that rule to allow this?


56 posted on 10/21/2004 12:16:06 PM PDT by mykroar ("Pearl Harbor" sucked . . . .and I miss you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: mykroar
Do we really think the UN (that idolizes Klinton) would not change that rule to allow this?

Russia would veto it in a heartbeat, they will never forgive Clinton for bombing their Serb brothers.

58 posted on 10/21/2004 12:17:18 PM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: mykroar

"Do we really think the UN (that idolizes Klinton) would not change that rule to allow this?"

I have no doubt, but would the US agree? (It's an awful thought.)


65 posted on 10/21/2004 12:23:13 PM PDT by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: mykroar
I totally disagree, Think about it. The UN may love Bill Clinton, but their greatest fear is American Power. There is no way in that they would ever vote in an American as the President.

The EU is already trying to take over, what a setback it would be if the UN President was an American, any American. So even if it wasn't against the rules, the 4 other permanent members would never allow it, just like we would never allow any of their citizens to take over.

71 posted on 10/21/2004 12:26:34 PM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson