To: COEXERJ145
A Federal Appeals court? I doubt the Supremes will bother themselves with this (they washed their hands of Nader in PA) so this seems final.
14 posted on
10/23/2004 5:05:17 PM PDT by
Petronski
(On the land in the air on the sea, let's swing out to Victory. --Fats Waller)
To: Petronski
Yes, and I am so glad I don't live in the 9th Circuit!
16 posted on
10/23/2004 5:06:04 PM PDT by
Tuxedo
(Real friends don't let friends vote Democrat.)
To: Petronski
As a Columbus Ohio resident, all I can say is,
WOOOOOO HOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mmmmmmmmm, Rulings
32 posted on
10/23/2004 5:11:49 PM PDT by
deltabean
(Born free, die free.)
To: Petronski
It should be binding in all states in this circuit (the 6th I believe - includes Mich)
57 posted on
10/23/2004 5:28:25 PM PDT by
The Vast Right Wing
(Some drink from the fountain of knowledge, the French and Germans only gargle)
To: Petronski
I will eat my own vomit if the SCOTUS overturns this one.
76 posted on
10/23/2004 5:49:59 PM PDT by
rwfromkansas
(BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
To: Petronski
The Supremes...they washed their hands of Nader in PA Since I already voted by absentee ballot in PA, I can tell you, Nader/Camejo is still on the absentee ballot, with a flyer insert explaining that it was too late to redo the ballot and take his name off, so if you want to vote for Nader/Camejo, put a mark in the box by their name. (You don't have to write in the name as you would at the polling place.)
141 posted on
10/23/2004 7:58:39 PM PDT by
Ciexyz
(Feeling so much calmer now I've cancelled my cable TV. Don't miss the Demopuke spin on cable news.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson