Skip to comments.
Bodies of 49 Iraqi soldiers found (Members of the new Iraqi army)
BBC ^
| October 24, 2004
| BBC
Posted on 10/24/2004 2:08:34 AM PDT by Former Military Chick
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-171 last
To: BagCamAddict
Whatever. I don't even go to church regularly. I just love people like you who sit on this board and make a mountain out of a gopher hole.
Obviously I touched a nerve in you, although that wasn't even close to my intention. And what's with the "horribly biased" quotation? I never said anything about you or anyone being "horribly biased" in this thread. Please refrain from misquoting me in future posts.
161
posted on
10/24/2004 6:25:22 PM PDT
by
Carling
(What happened to Sandy Burglar's Docs?)
To: TheDon
162
posted on
10/24/2004 6:28:14 PM PDT
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: SittinYonder
"Maybe this incident will change that."I don't know. Saudi changed theirs regarding foreigners arming for effective self defense. It's obvious folks should do that in Iraq, because of the batths and jihadis. Both of those groups use extortion and other forms of coercion to impede cooperation with the interim gov. The extortion is composed mostly of death threats to self and family. It's ridiculous not to arm for effective defense.
To: spunkets
It's ridiculous not to arm for effective defense.
Yep. The Iraqi Constitution is in desperate need of a Second Amendment.
164
posted on
10/24/2004 7:16:17 PM PDT
by
SittinYonder
(Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
To: Former Military Chick
Rules of Engagement for Iraqi soldiers: Once engaged, not that you have choosen it to be so, it is now a fight to the death. Do not go passively. Fight to the death. Do not lay down.
165
posted on
10/24/2004 7:21:16 PM PDT
by
Lester Moore
(Islam is begging to be destroyed by a Christian Crusade! Forthcoming!)
To: Carling
And what's with the "horribly biased" quotation? I never said anything about you or anyone being "horribly biased" in this thread. Please refrain from misquoting me in future posts.I wasn't quoting you with the "horribly biased" comment. My quotes from your post were italicized. However, I should have been more clear by only using quotation marks around the word "horribly", because you had said:
Interesting, if horribly flawed, chain of logic you have there.
I was re-using your use of the word "horribly" to accent the word "biased" in the same way that you had used "horribly" to accent the word "flawed".
166
posted on
10/24/2004 8:05:56 PM PDT
by
BagCamAddict
(NEVER FORGET. THE THREAT IS REAL AND PRESENT.)
To: elfman2
"Youd think all the brilliant people at the pentagon would have learned that by now."
You have to remember that every DOD military employee probably has 3-10 suits looking over his shoulder at the DOD. Probably have coordination meetings with state and Justice department people.
They need to dismiss the civilian employees and put combat experienced officers in their place. Get that State Department out of this situation, it is a MILITARY situation. One of struggle and blood.
State Department "protocols" and pc politeness not necessary here.
167
posted on
10/24/2004 9:05:06 PM PDT
by
JSteff
To: elfman2
"Probably because a bloodbath right before the elections would put the moderates out of power in three months. It needed to be done in April."
Israel has shown it does not take bloodbaths to control or intimidate the Muslims and Arabs. Just concerted force and unbending strength.
The Iraqi troops and police forces know this because they lived under it. Saddam was able to control the Iraqi's, they should be able to also.
They don't need to use chem or bio, just the unflinching determination and strength that Saddam did and the Israeli's do. It can be done.
168
posted on
10/24/2004 9:13:46 PM PDT
by
JSteff
To: BagCamAddict
Doesn't look like it to me. Looks like whoever shot them checked the bodies for valuables, ID cards, etc, which would have meant turning them over. Notice their shoes have all been removed.
169
posted on
10/24/2004 9:19:24 PM PDT
by
kms61
To: kms61
You're right. Plus, on further scrutiny, most of them have blood on the fronts of their shirts... blood wouldn't flow laterally or "up" if they were shot facing up. So they must have been shot facing down, and the blood flowed down onto the ground and soaked the front of their shirts.
This is such a sad sad tragedy. These poor guys... hearing their cohorts being shot one by one and knowing they were next. Animals did this, plain and simple.
170
posted on
10/24/2004 11:36:02 PM PDT
by
BagCamAddict
(NEVER FORGET. THE THREAT IS REAL AND PRESENT.)
To: Jonah Johansen
the actual status under the Geneva Convention of "insurgent" guerilla type fighters. My assumption is that armed enemy combatants not in uniform engaging in hostile action are afforded no protection. Exactly so- at least that's what I've read; and what has made it so important that our detainees are given the status POW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-171 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson