Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Other Networks' Election Loss Is Fox News's Big Gain
Washington Post ^ | 11/04/04 | Lisa de Moraes

Posted on 11/04/2004 7:03:00 AM PST by Pikamax

Other Networks' Election Loss Is Fox News's Big Gain

By Lisa de Moraes

Thursday, November 4, 2004; Page C07

A record number of voters may have turned out for the presidential election Tuesday, but they didn't translate to record audiences for the broadcast networks' election night coverage.

On the other hand, Tuesday was a very good night for Fox News Channel, which logged its biggest prime-time audience ever.

Collectively, the broadcast networks fumbled about 8 million of the viewers who had watched their prime time on election night in 2000. Ironically, the only broadcast network that can boast an increase is Fox, which doesn't even have a news division. Fox broadcast network clocked an average of 4.7 million viewers from 8 to 10 p.m. Tuesday with election coverage provided by Fox News Channel and helmed by Shepard Smith. (Fox News Channel's own coverage was helmed by Brit Hume.)

An average of 15.2 million people watched Tom Brokaw's last presidential election in the NBC anchor chair during prime time, Nielsen Media Research reports. In 2000, NBC had averaged more than 18 million viewers in prime time on election night.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionday; foxnews; foxnewsratings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: truthandlife

Goawd!!! Fox needs more "spice?!" Yikes. Maybe add teletubbie graphics to an already massively overloaded and obnoxious screen? I love Special Report and Cavuto, but the rest of it causes me a reflex reaction to hit "OFF."


21 posted on 11/04/2004 7:15:08 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

once they pulled the plug on the exit polls data they were the first to call Ohio!! and the election


22 posted on 11/04/2004 7:16:13 AM PST by rang1995
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

I wish Tony Snow had been included. Maybe they could have rotated? Surprisingly, I am getting to like Chris Wallace. He could have been rotated also.

Juan needed to be there all the time though. I just loved watching his "deer in the headlight" eyes.


23 posted on 11/04/2004 7:16:47 AM PST by GOP_Proud (Can I git me some morals here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

I've gotta agree. Barone was excellent and got better & better the later it got.


24 posted on 11/04/2004 7:17:06 AM PST by r.d.neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Pikamax
Interesting. They lost me at 7 p.m. I only monitored FR after that time.

Fox coverage on Special Report told me all I needed to know about the rest of the night's coverage, and I didn't feel like killing another TV.

26 posted on 11/04/2004 7:18:57 AM PST by mombonn ( ¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quick1

I heard this a.m. that ol' Dan has called Ms. Mapes to get her input...he may be considering calling Ohio for W.


27 posted on 11/04/2004 7:19:28 AM PST by r.d.neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Goodwillhntg
"i remain mildly pissed about FOXnot having the nards to call the election when NV was clearly Bush's, but a few FREEPER comments have me back to taking big breaths and thinking of calmer thoughts."

It was mentioned on Fox that the margin of error had to be ... 300 to 1 ... before they would announce any results.

28 posted on 11/04/2004 7:19:43 AM PST by G.Mason (A war mongering, UN hating, military industrial complex loving, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: Pikamax

IMHO Fox was a bit cowardly. They refused to give Nevada to Bush until word of Kerry's concession came down. Clearly they were afraid to call the election for Bush out of a fear of being branded the GOP Channel. But facts are facts, and that is what the news channels are supposed to report. If Bush won Nevada report it. It has nothing to do with a potential contest over Ohio.


30 posted on 11/04/2004 7:20:50 AM PST by The Hound Passer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

I am not talking about the graphics, I am talking about the format. I liked CNN's big screen format but Larry King as the old senile father in the crowd was hilarious.

MSNBC had an awful panel except for Joe Scarborough but the crowd in the background gave the show some energy. I don't think there is any way FOX could do this because the leftist would do something stupid and could be harmful to the staff.

FOX had no energy in the show and needed something. No more graphics please.


31 posted on 11/04/2004 7:21:17 AM PST by truthandlife (http://www.neverforgetneveragain.com -- If you want Bush re-elected pass on this video link!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: liberateUS
I've read and heard that exit polls don't lie because they are after the fact. They were trusting in those polls and the actual results were throwing them off.

I can feel a small pang of compassion for SKerry. Can you imagine, he probably went through most of the afternoon just knowing he was going to win and then the truth hit, ha, ha. Okay, maybe I don't feel bad.

32 posted on 11/04/2004 7:23:17 AM PST by tiki (Win one against the Flipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Proud; jwalsh07
Barone and Barnes with poor little Mort in the middle. That's a blood sport I'm comfortable with!

Then cutaway to Charles Krauthammer beat the hell outta Juanie Whiner Williams!!! Oh. I guess they already do that.

33 posted on 11/04/2004 7:24:09 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Poor little Jrong Juan...again.


34 posted on 11/04/2004 7:25:23 AM PST by GOP_Proud (Can I git me some morals here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Goodwillhntg

i remain mildly pissed about FOX not having the nards to call the election when NV was clearly Bush's, but a few FREEPER comments have me back to taking big breaths and thinking of calmer thoughts.. go GW!!<<<<<<<<<


I am with you on this. They had the little roundish male appendages to call OHIO and stick to it and then didn't have it to REPORT NV after 100% of the vote was counted because it would have put Bush over. It was excrutiating to watch them intentionally avoid even talking about NV while they agonized about NM and IA.


35 posted on 11/04/2004 7:27:03 AM PST by politicalmerc (I just want to make ignorance painful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow

I totally agree. I've been saying this for years. In a short time, ABC, NBC and CBS would be eating FOX's dust.


36 posted on 11/04/2004 7:27:19 AM PST by Freepdonia (Victory is Ours! (I told you so :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single
I agree, but poor old Brit. He was gobsmacked when Juan Williams went into the kook theory about Karl Rove being responsible for the early (false) exit poll data.

(Put Brit Hume voice here):

"Er, er, ah, ah, ah, . . . Juan, are you saying, . . . er, ah, are you saying KARL ROVE released this data? Ah, er, ah, . . . are you saying THAT?"

37 posted on 11/04/2004 7:27:48 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

I couldn't agree more. I watch Fox not for spice but for the news. I love Brit Hume for that reason. I watched other stations for comparison but none compared to FNC. Not even close. Fox's graphics were more precise and easier to read with more info. They caught on early in the evening that the exit poll stats were bogus and threw them away. Mort actually read what the exit polls were saying so that their listeners would understand what was going on. They're not supposed to do that and Bill Kristol gave him dirty looks a plenty. Great TV! And I do agree with everyone that Michael Barone was stellar.


38 posted on 11/04/2004 7:27:58 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I thought FOX was horrble Tuesday night. I was watching the roundtable and thought it was a eulogy for Bush. They got totally tricked by the exit polls, they should have known they would be worthless.


39 posted on 11/04/2004 7:28:29 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single

Brit looked tired. But considering he had probably already worked a full day before ever sitting down in the anchor chair on Tuesday evening, I can see why.

Most of his work, starting in the evening, came at an hour of the clock where he is usually not on the air. He also worked until 3:00 a.m. EST.

In short - I don't blame him for being tired.


40 posted on 11/04/2004 7:28:33 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Gloating? Us? Well, okay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson