Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith

I agree with you that the filibustering issue is very important but why does this have to be an either/or thing? Why can't we get rid of fillibustering AND put the best person in charge of the judiciary committee.

We won, let's act like it. You can be sure that the Democrats would if they were in our position. My feeling is that Bush will pursue an agressive conservative agenda because he doesn't have to be concerned about moving to the middle in order to make sure that he can be re-elected.


64 posted on 11/04/2004 11:23:46 AM PST by IrishBrewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: IrishBrewer
Winning the filibuster issue wins everything.
Removing a 'pro-choice' chairman wins nothing.

It's gonna take every bit of political capital there is to get the filibuster rule changed. Conservative, Liberal, Republican and Dem Senators all will lose some personal power if they change it.

68 posted on 11/04/2004 11:37:44 AM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice.. NOT Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson