Posted on 11/08/2004 12:07:05 PM PST by pookie18
Today's radio guests include Arlen Specter & John O'Neill!!!!!!!
I disagree. Hannity kept up the rhetoric and litany of kerry inadequacies until we all could recite them.
Agree, he also went on the college circuit to rebut the Mooreon.
Thanks for reminding me- I'd forgotten to point out, that another thing I don't like much about him, is he too often calls people "my good friend" who clearly are not.
That's been annoying me a lot of times. Liberals ought to be defeated NOT called "my friend"- they'll never be our friends. Look how hard Bush tried and extended a hand to them- only to have it bitten off!
I'm not saying I like Specter, I'm just wondering about Hewitt's view on this. Hewitt's usually pretty good and he seems to be standing alone on this.
bump
It'll be interesting to see how the TV & Radio ratings change for O'Rielly/Hannity and Bozo, now that the election is over. November is sweeps month - Arlen Specter seems to be the hot topic. Kinda feel sorry for the old RINO (sarc), all the wrath of the conservative bloggers/FReepers is focused on Specter now (but he deserves it!) Note: "Bloggers" comes up as a misspell on the post site - one of those new fangled words I guess....
Yeah maybe, but it sure is better than constantly hearing, "creepy lying liar, moron, idiot, and scumbag."
Too bad he talked about the election only, I wish he'd keep talking about Spectre as he's got the biggest audience out there and could help us a lot.
Maybe he ought to here more from all of us.
on live now
Thanks! Am listening right now!
Hannity's starting off worse than I thought- he said he "likes Spectre"- oh pleeeeezzze!!! I think I'll throw up...
Sean Hannity likes everyone, that's his approach anyway. He must have more "friends" than Gov. Arnold!
That's the least of my worries. Liberals are not our enemies, they just have a totally different perspective on the world, one that is more dangerous than our side. Once Liberals assume power in this country, we (Liberals/Democrats/Conservatives/Republicans/Everyone in between) are more at risk.
I got confused when I saw Hugh Hewitt's take on this also. I think I'm going to e-mail him. Maybe he will discuss it on his radio show today. I hope so. He was really behind getting the SBVT story out in the open. I get the impression that he think that with so much pressure put on Frist to keep Spector out of the Chairmanship, that Spector will have to be "a good boy" because he will have so much scrutiny, that he wouldn't get away with stabbing Bush in the back.
The problem with that theory is, a lot of this is done behind closed doors and away from C-span, and even then, if he votes a certain way, what are we going to do?
No matter what he says I can't trust him
Actually Arlen is dead-on regarding 1992's race against Lynn Yeakel. He took enormous heat from that while knowing that Clinton would carry his state easily on the same election day. He should be given kudos for that courageous stand. He only got 49% of the vote in 1992 because of it.
I forgot something -------
There is another thread going now, that is very scary and makes the fight against Spector more important.
It seems that Justice O'Conner and several others are starting to subscribe to the "International Law" way of thinking now. They are truly thinking that we should take "international law" into account in UNITED STATES COURTS!!!!!!!!!
Specter is showing his true colors on Hannity. He is showing that he cannot be trusted.
i agree...he cannot be chairman
He has a difficult time answering very direct questions. Showing his true colors.
How is that? Bork felt that the 14th amendment didn't apply to women that it only applied to a person's ethnicity? I agree with Specter on that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.