The point is that CVS does support everything the pharmacist did, with the exception of not handing back the prescription.
It wasn't so much directed at you as it was correcting an important fact left out by the obviously biased Yahoo story.
That has been my position this entire thread, and honestly, is the only correct position. If the pharmacist has an agreement with the employer regarding the ability to deny certain prescriptions that is fine. Absent that agreement the pharmacist should fill all prescriptions. And under no circumstances should the pharmacist steal a customers perscription.