Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spiff
"At what cost"

In the first debate, Kerry said he would have given nuclear fuel to Iran to see if they were going to use it in a peaceful manner - to test them. Totally insain. Bush wants to make it easier for illegals to contribute to our society legally. Arguably problematic. I'll choose the latter every time.
103 posted on 11/10/2004 1:41:35 PM PST by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: mudblood
Arguably problematic. I'll choose the latter every time.

The point is; You don't get to choose.

125 posted on 11/10/2004 1:53:44 PM PST by itsahoot (Sometimes the truth hurts, sometimes it makes a difference, but not often. <(•¿•)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood
In the first debate, Kerry said he would have given nuclear fuel to Iran to see if they were going to use it in a peaceful manner - to test them. Totally insain. Bush wants to make it easier for illegals to contribute to our society legally. Arguably problematic. I'll choose the latter every time.

I agree. I would definitely cast my vote against John Kerry again. However, I made the mistake of thinking I was voting FOR George W. Bush. This knife in my back has changed my opinion considerably. I'm sure that my Border Patrol Agent friends would agree. Maybe this session Congress could cut more of their funding to add further insult to injury. You know, 50% of their vehicles routinely sit in the repair yard waiting to be fixed? Over half of their cameras and night vision scopes - permanent and vehicle mounted - are not functional?

One of my Border Patrol Agent friends just got called up to the Reserves and is one his way to Iraq. I'm sure that this crap just brightens his day and really makes him feel good about what he's doing. Here he'd been risking his life guarding our porous border against human smugglers, drug smugglers, terrorists, and such and now he's being sent to the other side of the world to kill terrorists and Islamofascists while his wife and kids are threatened at home by our wide open border. Morale is REAL high among Border Patrol Agents - NOT! And every time Bush or his administration betrays them even further, the morale just gets that much better.

What's the freakin' point!? Why don't they take down that last few strands of rusty barbed wire, pack up the Border Patrol, and send them home? If they're not going to let the BP Agents do their damned job of if they're just going to reward those who escaped the Agents with amnesty and jobs and eventual citizenship - why bother with the whole thing? Is it all just for show!? And a dangerous show that is with the terrorists who would just LOVE to sneak - hell, they can just walk in open daylight - across our border and slit your throat or that of your wife, husband, child, mother, father, sister, brother, whatever...

The serious lack of will to secure our borders and enforce our laws is truly tragic. Where will it lead? Terrorist attacks? Unemployed/underemployed AMERICANS? Massive culture shift? Overpopulation? Voter fraud? It boggles the mind how people can defend this amnesty plan.

146 posted on 11/10/2004 2:05:24 PM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson