To: South40
I agree the counting will not change the outcome. But it is never a waste of time to count votes. If people voted according to the rules then they deserve to be counted. Lets not confuse unneeded recounts with counting the original legitimately cast votes. I am sure if you were one of those you would want your voice counted.
18 posted on
11/17/2004 11:27:55 AM PST by
Keith59
(God Bless the United States and help guide the President of the United States - George Bush)
To: Keith59
I thought I made this clear with my referrence to numbers of PBs cast and number needed for Kerry to win. Apparently not.
It's a waste of time for those who think it will or may change the result of the election.
20 posted on
11/17/2004 11:34:21 AM PST by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: Keith59
I am sure if you were one of those you would want your voice counted. If I wanted my vote counted I would keep my registration up to date.
30 posted on
11/17/2004 12:09:10 PM PST by
js1138
(D*mn, I Missed!)
To: Keith59
I agree the counting will not change the outcome. But it is never a waste of time to count votes. If people voted according to the rules then they deserve to be counted. Lets not confuse unneeded recounts with counting the original legitimately cast votes. I am sure if you were one of those you would want your voice counted.Let me give you a blated welcome to the Free Republic.
True it is not a waste to recount, if the count was not done correctly the first time. The danger in a recount is that the losing side now knows how many ballots they need to come up with to win.
38 posted on
11/17/2004 12:38:45 PM PST by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson