For a start, posting his "art on a site called "Images AGAINST War" is a pretty big indicator to me.
I really don't have time to get into a logic/fallcies debate on dicto simpliciter, etc. today. Freepers can post where ever they like, as long as it does not put US or UK troops in extra danger.
The guy posts at a images against war website, ends up embedded with US troops and all of a sudden produces an incendiary tape (which now appears to have been editied) And this is having a similar effect the Daily Mirror fakes did...
There is a process that Kevin Sites should have followed, he didn't. Whether he posts nice blogs or not, i see an agenda in his actions and time will surely tell.
For a start, posting his "art on a site called "Images AGAINST War" is a pretty big indicator to me.
I don't take the posting of his photos at Imagesagainstwar to be definitive of anything. It might be a political statement or simply a practical decision. He's a free-lance photographer and basically anyone who has a position on war is a potential market. There was certainly nothing incendiary about the Sites' photos that are posted there.