Posted on 11/19/2004 1:14:50 PM PST by hinterlander
Conservative activists who protested Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter's bid to chair the Judiciary Committee are vowing are keep pressure on the liberal Republican and his Senate colleagues who have vowed to support him.
A formal vote on Specter's ascension won't happen until January. Even though the nine Republicans on the Judiciary Committee are backing Specter, his support in the 55-member Senate Republican Conference remains unclear.
"Anything can happen in two months," said the Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, who led a protest against Specter earlier this week on Capitol Hill. "Let's face the political realities, but I don't think it's both morally or strategically wise to throw in the towel this early."
Mahoney told HUMAN EVENTS his Christian Defense Coalition was still planning to hold a nationwide protest against Specter on December 9. On that day, constituents are encouraged to visit their senators' home-state offices to voice their concerns about Specter.
The conservative Concerned Women for America, one the most vocal anti-Specter groups, hasn't relented in the wake of Specter's concession Thursday to support President Bush's nominees and move legislation through the committee, even if he opposes it.
"The grassroots who have inundated the Senate with tens of thousands of e-mails and phone calls protesting Specter's appointment as committee chairman will remain energized in holding Specter accountable," said Jan LaRue, CWA's chief counsel.
Others, including Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family Action, Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council and Gary Bauer of American Values, continued to criticized Specter, but didn't promise any additional protests in the near future.
With the backing of the nine Republicans on the Judiciary Committee, Specter has already locked up a crucial bloc of support among his colleagues. Other Republicans, including Senators Norm Coleman (Minn.), Trent Lott (Miss.) Richard Lugar (Ind.) and John McCain (Ariz.) have already said they would vote for Specter.
Only Sen. James Inhofe (R.-Okla.) has publicly expressed opposition to Specter. In an interview with HUMAN EVENTS this week, Inhofe said Hatch's endorsement of Specter certainly eased tensions in the GOP and likely silenced opposition inside the party.
"As of right now, I would still oppose him," Inhofe said Wednesday. "But it's meaningless, however, because I'd probably be the only one."
Mahoney said his December 9 protest would be designed to raise doubts with senators about Specter. He also said it's an opportunity to assert the power of pro-lifers, who Mahoney said Republicans are taking for granted.
"The pro-family, pro-life voting bloc is almost being viewed by the Republican Party as African Americans are viewed by the Democratic Party," Mahoney said. "Specter getting to the Judiciary, although it's very disturbing, I think is dwarfed by a larger problem. The Republican leadership truly does not respect nor understand our constituency."
Chief among Mahoney's targets is Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, chairman of the Senate Republican Conference. As the third-ranking Republican in the Senate, Mahoney said Santorum should be prepared to face a tough fight when he faces re-election in 2006.
Santorum's support for Specter in this year's Pennsylvania primary angered conservatives, who preferred Rep. Pat Toomey. Toomey lost by a mere 17,000 votes of the more than 1 million that were cast.
Despite Santorum's friendship with Specter, he has stopped short of supporting his bid to become chairman of the Judiciary Committee. At a Wednesday press conference, Santorum said, "I think it would be presumptuous of me to direct the committee as to who they should appoint as their chairman."
Even if Santorum were to oppose Specter by voting against him when it reaches the Senate Republican Conference, Mahoney said it wouldn't have much of an impact with the pro-life community.
"We're going to use Senator Santorum as a template," Mahoney said. "Because of what he has done with Specter -- putting party over principle -- we are going to work to see that he's not re-elected in 2006."
Mahoney's early alternatives include Toomey, whose campaign manager didn't return a call to HUMAN EVENTS, and newly elected Pennsylvania Treasurer Bob Casey Jr., who received more than 3.3-million votes on November 2, the most ever for a candidate in Pennsylvania.
-----------
Copyright © 2004 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.
bump
oh yeah? what are they going to do about it?
Gun Owners of America: Battle Over Senator Arlen Specter Heating Up
If pro-abortion judges are put on the USSC or lesser courts, pro-life Catholics and evengelicals will stay home in 2006. Thye've stayed home before - 1996, 1998 and 2000, when 4 million evangelicals stayed home and Bush nearly lost.
I suspect Bush and his people know this. Bush wants to appoint pro-lifers out of principle, I think, but also because it's good politics.
I know ~ I get the GOA newsletter, I'm a member.
Have you seen this:
Reprinted from NewsMax.com
Saturday, Nov. 20, 2004 9:36 p.m. EST
Condi: Why I Support the Second Amendment
Secretary of State nominee Dr. Condoleezza Rice is a big supporter of the Second Amendment, a commitment cultivated during her days growing up in Bull Conner's Birmingham, Ala., when the shotgun wielded by her father was often the only thing that stood between her family and the Ku Klux Klan.
In 1963, racial violence was "turning her hometown into 'Bombingham' as Alabamas governor George Wallace fought a federal court order to integrate the citys schools," writes Rice biographer Antonia Felix. In excerpts of her book "The Condoleezza Rice Story," reprinted in the London Sunday Times, Felix recounts:
"With the bombings came marauding groups of armed white vigilantes called 'nightriders,' who drove through black neighborhoods shooting and starting fires. [Condi's father] John Rice and his neighbors guarded the streets at night with shotguns.
"The memory of her father out on patrol lies behind Rices opposition to gun control today. Had those guns been registered, she argues, Bull Connor would have had a legal right to take them away, thereby removing one of the black communitys only means of defense."
"I have a sort of pure Second Amendment view of the right to bear arms," said the future secretary of state.
Editor's note:
Laugh with Ronald Reagan get the tape of his greatest jokes Click Here for FREE offer
Join NewsMaxs "Reach America" program and put us in your local library Click Here Now!
Condi Rice for president? Find out the details Click Here Now
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Bush Administration
108-108-108-104
Thanks for posting it. Good news is hard to come by these days.
~~This is the party that tries to alter the way overtime is figured, ships jobs overseas, imports cheap technical labor, turns a blind eye towards the illegal invasion, passes laws to prevent buying prescriptions outside the U.S., pushes laws to eliminate "country of origin" from our food labels, ad nauseum. They have their collective noses so far between the cheeks of el presidente Fox and Corporate America that it's fogged their perception. And you say MY sense of smell is backwards?~~
Yep - the GOP is being dumbed down by liberalism to attract a broader base and is going to lose a huge number of conservatives if they don't move right. There will be no accepted excuses this time around. We could end up with a three party system -socialists [Dems], Liberals [Repub's] and a Conservative party.
Re post # 65: It probably should have posted as a new Thread with a Ping to Joe Brower and the Bang list. *sigh*
I stopped posting new threads; every time I did, I found it had been posted before. :)
You're right; it's great to read/hear positive 2nd Amendment stuff!
Be Ever Vigilant!
I agree with Crampton!
The Eagle Forum is right ~ Bump!
bttt fyi
Steve Moore nailed it ~ Bump!
Bork Specter ~ now!
That was written on Nov 8 ~
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.