What are you kidding me? You clearly see people fleeing form the tanks. You clearly see NO guns on anyone in the video. You clearly hear gun fire and tons of people screaming. What more do you need to hear and see?
"What are you kidding me? You clearly see people fleeing form the tanks. You clearly see NO guns on anyone in the video. You clearly hear gun fire and tons of people screaming. What more do you need to hear and see?"
No I'm not kidding you. I don't anything in that video except the aftermath. I doubt that anyone with a gun would be standing out in plain view to be shot by the Frenchies. You cannot definitively state that something did not happen just because you don't see it in a poor quality video from an obstructed perspective. The real world is not 2 dimensional like this video. I'm not saying that other people were shooting at the French, but it is possible. I'll give the tape another view and see if I can see or hear the first shots, but this video does not prove anything other than that the French were involved in some type of gunfight in which civilians were killed. The French were complicit in Hussein's genocide, so I don't need to infer something from an inconclusive video in order to see them for what they are. However, I will call things how I see them. Explain where this video shows the French clearly shooting into the crowd, let alone firing first. People looked like they were running for cover, and not necessarily from the French alone.