Posted on 11/21/2004 9:55:29 AM PST by Ginifer
The United Nations knew that Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was stealing from the oil-for-food program - and, by extension, starving his own people - but did little to stop it, according to a special report by the BBC at the weekend.
After a six-month investigation, the BBC said it had evidence that Saddam took billions from the oil-for-food program, and that "these abuses were widely known about at the time". The BBC said there was evidence that Saddam demanded a kickback from companies that wanted to do business with Iraq under the oil-for-food program.
Australia sold wheat worth about $A1 billion to Iraq under the program but the Australian Wheat Board strongly denies wrongdoing. However, US congressman Chris Shays told the BBC that Saddam "didn't participate with you if he couldn't get kickbacks.
"He didn't buy commodities unless he got kickbacks so, if you agreed to participate, you agreed to do it on his terms. And we know what those terms were."
The Age reported last year that Australia sold wheat to Iraq at what appears to be an inflated price.
The wheat board says it never gave a cut of its contracts to Saddam. It was forced to pay a Jordanian trucking company to move its wheat around Iraq. That trucking company was selected by Saddam.
The BBC sent a reporter to Iraq and Jordan to track down people involved in the oil-for-food program, which has been described as the largest financial swindle in history. Virtually all said that Saddam took kickbacks from companies who sold goods to Iraq, and that the UN knew this. The businessmen - most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity - said it was standard to pay commissions, that nobody complained, and that was the price of doing business with Iraq.
A Jordanian banker said it was an open secret that contracts were inflated so Saddam could take 10 per cent. "We knew it was there," he said. "(But) actually, it's not our business, you know. Banks are (only) interested in their money, and to make money."
The allegations have left the UN fighting for its reputation. The oil-for-food program is being investigated by six US congressional committees and by the UN itself.
Many UN officials believe the US is trying to divert media attention towards the oil-for-food program as a way of punishing the UN for failing to back the war in Iraq.
Others believe the US is using the investigations as a way of distracting attention from the war. Mr Shay said: "Well, the UN is sure making it easy (to attack)."
The oil-for-food program ran from 1997 to 2003. It was supposed to allow Saddam to sell oil, provided he used the money only to buy food and medicine.
Since the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, evidence has emerged that Saddam found many ways to skim billions from the program. Some of that money allegedly went to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. It is also alleged that Saddam paid foreign journalists and sympathetic foreign officials, as a way of getting them to campaign to get the sanctions lifted. Around 270 people are alleged to have received vouchers to sell oil for millions of dollars in profit.
Among the people accused of taking these bribes are the former president of Indonesia, Megawati Soekarnoputri, and, most explosively, the head of the UN's oil-for-food program Benon Sevan.
Of course the UN knew about it. I remember seeing media reports saying that Saddam was demanding a under the table surcharge for the oil. I'm flabbergasted that this is big news. Everybody is acting like this is new news, like Tom Cruise says in Collateral.
I mean I saw these reports in 2000 and well beefore the liberation.
The UN was in the middle of it. The BBC is trying to cover for the Anan and the UN
Thanks for posting this !
Kickback imbedded!
A Jordanian banker said it was an open secret that contracts were inflated so Saddam could take 10 per cent. "We knew it was there," he said. "(But) actually, it's not our business, you know. Banks are (only) interested in their money, and to make money."
Euroweenies are like Bankers....
Do I hear impeachment for Kofi?
Yes of course Fox has been leading the way....but now all of a sudden it is starting to take off in other countries. Maybe the world will finally wake up to the fact that the UN is no friend to anyone.
Any comments from Kofi Annan regarding this news?
The BBC just woke up !! I'm underwhelmed!
The entire international minor official left is a racket. They do whatever the Party tells them to do, for bribe money. They do not have any principles and never have. The ones willing to bribe them are barbarian tyrants. Consequently, the international left is a publicity machine for barbarian tyrants. Has been for decades. Since Joe Stalin.
I'm positive our INTEL knew about it too.
"The UN is fighting for it's reputation"
BALDERDASH! I grew up with the UN and supported it in spirit (and taxes) for lots of years. No more. Either reinvent it or just get rid of it. The tail is wagging the dog...just like they tried to do it here on NOv 2. It will happen here too if we aren't careful. If you do not contribute to society, you should not have a vote. The UN is precisely living down to it's reputation. No more money. Give the money to the missionaries who will spend it on the people...teaching them how to fish instead of giving them a fish... And send Kofi back to Africa in the disgrace he deserves
Sounds like the traditional new york mob style of doing business and keeping the peace.
I thought Christina Rosett (sp?) of the WSJ was first.
BTTT
Could be, I would be curious to see how this truly big story develops in that the left love to dismiss Fox and other "right wing" news sources as irrelevant for "real news"... yet who in taking the lead and who is dragging their feet... like memogate
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.