Venus would be much more difficult. There's no water on Venus (Mars has some in the icecaps and probably underground) and has 1000 times the atmosphere we'd need, not to mention it's all CO2. Plus, since it is closer to the Sun, it would be difficult to cool it off enough to be habitable.
There have been some interesting proposals regarding Venus to hit it with ice asteroids to introduce water, blast away some of the excess atmosphere, cool the surface, and increase its rotational period from its current 116 days to something a bit more practical.
There's a lot of water on Venus isn't it? It's water vapor trapped in the atmosphere though. There is no liquid water on Venus however.
Image of the surface of Venus from the Russian Venera-13 lander.
> Venus would be much more difficult.
In it's way, Venus would be *less* difficult. Notice where Venus' atmosphere reaches one standard atmosphere of pressure... and what the temperature is there.
> There's no water on Venus
There are oceans of water on Venus... trapped in the sulphuric acid. Relatively easily cracked and utilized.
> 1000 times the atmosphere we'd need, not to mention it's all CO2
All to the better.
> it would be difficult to cool it off enough to be habitable.
No need to do so whatsoever.
I heard somewhere that Venus' surface temperature is around 800 degrees.
By comparison, terraforming Venus makes the idea of terraforming Mars look as simple as doing some landscaping work around the yard.
One brute-force method I came up with to thin-out the Venusian atmosphere is to simultaneously air-burst tens of thousands of high-megaton fusion bombs and just blast all that CO2 out into space. What a spectacular view that would be from Earth! Venus flaring up like a nova, then turning into the biggest damned comet ever seen as its atmosphere is blown outward by the solar wind.