Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eagle11

Venus would be much more difficult. There's no water on Venus (Mars has some in the icecaps and probably underground) and has 1000 times the atmosphere we'd need, not to mention it's all CO2. Plus, since it is closer to the Sun, it would be difficult to cool it off enough to be habitable.


18 posted on 11/22/2004 11:49:48 AM PST by RockinRight (Liberals are OK with racism and sexism, as long as it is aimed at a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight
True, plus Venus is in near "tidal lock" with the Sun, its day is actually longer than its year. This would present climatic extremes for humans even if we could change Venus to our liking. Mars, although its surface gravity is 38% of Earth's, is more suitable for the near-term. But I believe (the romantic idea) that we'll sidestep these worlds, due to some future propulsion tech. that will permit settling other star systems.
26 posted on 11/22/2004 11:54:11 AM PST by eagle11 (A worthy goal: Global society founded upon individual freedom, property rights and the rule of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

There have been some interesting proposals regarding Venus to hit it with ice asteroids to introduce water, blast away some of the excess atmosphere, cool the surface, and increase its rotational period from its current 116 days to something a bit more practical.


31 posted on 11/22/2004 11:59:38 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight
There's no water on Venus

There's a lot of water on Venus isn't it? It's water vapor trapped in the atmosphere though. There is no liquid water on Venus however.

Image of the surface of Venus from the Russian Venera-13 lander.

33 posted on 11/22/2004 12:01:05 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

> Venus would be much more difficult.

In it's way, Venus would be *less* difficult. Notice where Venus' atmosphere reaches one standard atmosphere of pressure... and what the temperature is there.

> There's no water on Venus

There are oceans of water on Venus... trapped in the sulphuric acid. Relatively easily cracked and utilized.

> 1000 times the atmosphere we'd need, not to mention it's all CO2

All to the better.

> it would be difficult to cool it off enough to be habitable.

No need to do so whatsoever.


37 posted on 11/22/2004 12:03:38 PM PST by orionblamblam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight
Plus, since it is closer to the Sun, it would be difficult to cool it off enough to be habitable.

I heard somewhere that Venus' surface temperature is around 800 degrees.

44 posted on 11/22/2004 12:13:12 PM PST by JimRed (Investigate, overturn and prosecute vote fraud; turn more counties red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight
Cooling Venus could be accomplished by unfurling a giant shade or filter and hanging it between Venus and the sun.

By comparison, terraforming Venus makes the idea of terraforming Mars look as simple as doing some landscaping work around the yard.

One brute-force method I came up with to thin-out the Venusian atmosphere is to simultaneously air-burst tens of thousands of high-megaton fusion bombs and just blast all that CO2 out into space. What a spectacular view that would be from Earth! Venus flaring up like a nova, then turning into the biggest damned comet ever seen as its atmosphere is blown outward by the solar wind.

82 posted on 11/22/2004 3:48:20 PM PST by FierceDraka ("Megatons Make It Fun!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson